§ The result
Maki People leads Tribepad on all 7 criteria.
Maki People sits 11 points above Tribepad under rubric v1.0 — 67 (D) against 56 (F) — with Maki People filed under Assessment and Tribepad under ATS-integrated. Maki People leads every one of the 7 criteria, Tribepad none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Post-Market Monitoring, Maki People 55 to Tribepad 54. One criterion, FRIA Support, is both the widest raw gap (Maki People 62, Tribepad 30) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 15% weight it makes up 47% of the weighted advantage Maki People holds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Maki People
Maki People is a Paris-based AI hiring platform whose core product is pre-hire assessment and screening of candidate skills, behaviors, and situational judgement at high volume, extended with conversational AI agents for screening, interview support, and scheduling.
Vendor profile
Tribepad
Tribepad is a UK applicant tracking system whose built-in Sidekick AI assistant scores and ranks applicants against recruiter-weighted skills and generates candidate summaries, SWOT analyses, job descriptions, salary suggestions and interview questions.
§ The record
Maki People is filed under Assessment AI, Tribepad under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773 and Colorado AI Act. Only Maki People is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Maki People | Tribepad |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | FR | GB |
| Founded | 2021 | 2008 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
15% weight · 47% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Maki People 62 · Tribepad 30
4.8 weighted points to Maki People
20% weight · 62% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Maki People 64 · Tribepad 56
1.6 weighted points to Maki People
8% weight · 74% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Maki People 74 · Tribepad 58
1.3 weighted points to Maki People
15% weight · 86% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Maki People 64 · Tribepad 56
1.2 weighted points to Maki People
12% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Maki People 66 · Tribepad 58
1.0 weighted points to Maki People
18% weight · 99% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Maki People 80 · Tribepad 78
0.4 weighted points to Maki People
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Maki People 55 · Tribepad 54
0.1 weighted points to Maki People
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +10.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 10.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +11 beside that +10.3.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Maki People minus Tribepad.
| Category | Weight | Maki People | Tribepad | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 64 | 56 | +8 | +1.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 80 | 78 | +2 | +0.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 62 | 30 | +32 | +4.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 64 | 56 | +8 | +1.2 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 66 | 58 | +8 | +1.0 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 55 | 54 | +1 | +0.1 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 74 | 58 | +16 | +1.3 |
| Total | 100% | 67 (D) | 56 (F) | +11 | +10.3 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Maki People | Tribepad | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 25 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 28 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Maki People has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Tribepad has 32 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Maki People and Tribepad sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 63 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 31 for Maki People, across 5 distinct source domains, and 32 for Tribepad, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Maki People last reviewed
- September 8, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Tribepad last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next