§ The result
4 points separate Manatal and myInterview.
Manatal (ATS-integrated) edges myInterview (Video interview) by 4 points under rubric v1.0, 41 to 37. Manatal leads 5 of the 7 criteria, including Customer Documentation, while myInterview leads 2, including Bias Audit Transparency. The heaviest weighted swing runs the other way — myInterview takes Bias Audit Transparency at 18%, Manatal 22 to myInterview 35, 70% of the weighted advantage myInterview holds — while the widest raw gap sits on Customer Documentation, Manatal 62 to myInterview 40.
Vendor profile
Manatal
Cloud-based applicant tracking system and recruitment CRM for agencies and HR teams, featuring an AI engine that scores and ranks candidates against job requirements and an asynchronous AI video Interviewer.
Vendor profile
myInterview
myInterview is an asynchronous one-way video interview platform that records candidate video responses and applies AI-assisted "Smart Shortlisting" and Big Five-based personality insights to help recruiters screen and rank applicants.
§ The record
Manatal is filed under ATS-integrated AI, myInterview under Video interview AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act, Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Manatal | myInterview |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Mid |
| Headquarters | TH | AU |
| Founded | 2019 | 2014 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 22% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Manatal 22 · myInterview 35
2.3 weighted points to myInterview
8% weight · 39% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Manatal 62 · myInterview 40
1.8 weighted points to Manatal
15% weight · 54% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Manatal 52 · myInterview 42
1.5 weighted points to Manatal
12% weight · 67% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Manatal 60 · myInterview 48
1.4 weighted points to Manatal
15% weight · 79% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Manatal 33 · myInterview 25
1.2 weighted points to Manatal
12% weight · 90% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Manatal 43 · myInterview 33
1.2 weighted points to Manatal
20% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Manatal 33 · myInterview 38
1.0 weighted points to myInterview
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +3.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 10.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +4 beside that +3.8.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Manatal minus myInterview.
| Category | Weight | Manatal | myInterview | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 33 | 38 | -5 | -1.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 22 | 35 | -13 | -2.3 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 33 | 25 | +8 | +1.2 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 52 | 42 | +10 | +1.5 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 60 | 48 | +12 | +1.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 43 | 33 | +10 | +1.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 62 | 40 | +22 | +1.8 |
| Total | 100% | 41 (F) | 37 (F) | +4 | +3.8 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Manatal | myInterview | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 15 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 7 | 6 | Sources on a separate domain |
Manatal has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 15 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; myInterview has 13 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 7 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for myInterview sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 33 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 20 for Manatal, across 1 distinct source domain, and 13 for myInterview, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Manatal last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- myInterview last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next