§ The result
Manatal leads Pulsifi on all 7 criteria.
Under rubric v1.0, Manatal, filed under ATS-integrated, finishes on 41 and Pulsifi, filed under Assessment, on 33, 8 points apart. Manatal takes all 7 criteria from Pulsifi without a 20-point raw gap on any of them; the closest is Bias Audit Transparency, Manatal 22 to Pulsifi 20. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: Customer Documentation (Manatal 62, Pulsifi 46) and Data Governance Disclosure at 15% (Manatal 52, Pulsifi 40), the second being 24% of the weighted advantage Manatal holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Manatal
Cloud-based applicant tracking system and recruitment CRM for agencies and HR teams, featuring an AI engine that scores and ranks candidates against job requirements and an asynchronous AI video Interviewer.
Vendor profile
Pulsifi
Pulsifi gives candidates and employees 0-100 Role Fit and Organizational Fit scores that combine personality, work-interest, work-culture and cognitive assessments with AI resume and skills analysis, and uses the scores to rank people for hiring, internal mobility and succession.
§ The record
Manatal is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Pulsifi under Assessment AI. They also share 2 secondary categories: Screening and Video interview.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act, Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Manatal | Pulsifi |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Mid |
| Headquarters | TH | SG |
| Founded | 2019 | 2017 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
15% weight · 24% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Manatal 52 · Pulsifi 40
1.8 weighted points to Manatal
12% weight · 47% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Manatal 43 · Pulsifi 28
1.8 weighted points to Manatal
8% weight · 64% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Manatal 62 · Pulsifi 46
1.3 weighted points to Manatal
15% weight · 80% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Manatal 33 · Pulsifi 25
1.2 weighted points to Manatal
20% weight · 87% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Manatal 33 · Pulsifi 30
0.6 weighted points to Manatal
12% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Manatal 60 · Pulsifi 55
0.6 weighted points to Manatal
18% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Manatal 22 · Pulsifi 20
0.4 weighted points to Manatal
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +7.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 7.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +8 beside that +7.6.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Manatal minus Pulsifi.
| Category | Weight | Manatal | Pulsifi | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 33 | 30 | +3 | +0.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 22 | 20 | +2 | +0.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 33 | 25 | +8 | +1.2 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 52 | 40 | +12 | +1.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 60 | 55 | +5 | +0.6 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 43 | 28 | +15 | +1.8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 62 | 46 | +16 | +1.3 |
| Total | 100% | 41 (F) | 33 (F) | +8 | +7.6 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Manatal | Pulsifi | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | — | 3 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 15 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 26 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Manatal has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 15 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Pulsifi has 33 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 26 with a source URL, 7 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 53 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 20 for Manatal, across 1 distinct source domain, and 33 for Pulsifi, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Manatal last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Pulsifi last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next