Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Mercer | Mettl vs Pinpoint
Side-by-side scores and evidence under the HireAIScore rubric v1.0. Click a vendor name to jump to the full profile and the cited evidence behind each score.
Export comparison (CSV)Pro→Vendor profile
Mercer | Mettl
Mercer | Mettl is an online talent assessment and remote-proctoring platform offering psychometric, aptitude, coding, and skills tests plus AI-assisted exam proctoring and scoring for hiring, certification, and L&D.
Vendor profile
Pinpoint
Pinpoint is an applicant tracking system for in-house talent teams that layers AI-assisted screening onto core hiring workflows — candidate match scores, AI filters, anonymized screening, an interview notetaker, and a hiring copilot for outreach and rejections.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Mercer | Mettl minus Pinpoint.
| Category | Weight | Mercer | Mettl | Pinpoint | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 38 | 72 | -34 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 42 | 42 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 28 | 38 | -10 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 55 | 68 | -13 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 45 | 64 | -19 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 38 | 52 | -14 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 52 | 66 | -14 |
| Total | 100% | 42 (F) | 57 (F) | -15 |
§ Evidence summary
Evidence count
Mercer | Mettl
14 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 7
- absence
- 5
- public statement
- 2
Evidence count
Pinpoint
20 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 13
- public statement
- 5
- absence
- 2