§ The result
Metaview leads myInterview on 6 of the 7 criteria.
Metaview finishes 17 points clear of myInterview under rubric v1.0 — 54 against 37 — across the Screening and Video interview cohorts. Metaview leads 6 of the 7 criteria and the remaining criterion is level, so myInterview is ahead on none of them; the closest of the 6 Metaview leads is FRIA Support, Metaview 33 to myInterview 25. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Metaview 80, myInterview 35 — and at an 18% weight it carries 48% of the weighted advantage Metaview holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Metaview
Metaview is an AI recruiting platform whose agents transcribe and summarize interviews into structured notes and scorecards, and whose Application Review feature screens and ranks inbound applicants against an auto-generated Ideal Candidate Profile with fit ratings.
Vendor profile
myInterview
myInterview is an asynchronous one-way video interview platform that records candidate video responses and applies AI-assisted "Smart Shortlisting" and Big Five-based personality insights to help recruiters screen and rank applicants.
§ The record
Metaview is filed under Screening AI, myInterview under Video interview AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act, Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Metaview | myInterview |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | GB | AU |
| Founded | 2018 | 2014 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 48% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Metaview 80 · myInterview 35
8.1 weighted points to Metaview
15% weight · 64% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Metaview 60 · myInterview 42
2.7 weighted points to Metaview
12% weight · 74% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Metaview 48 · myInterview 33
1.8 weighted points to Metaview
8% weight · 84% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Metaview 62 · myInterview 40
1.8 weighted points to Metaview
12% weight · 93% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Metaview 60 · myInterview 48
1.4 weighted points to Metaview
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Metaview 33 · myInterview 25
1.2 weighted points to Metaview
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +17.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 17.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +17 beside that +17.0.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Metaview minus myInterview.
| Category | Weight | Metaview | myInterview | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 38 | 38 | - | - |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 80 | 35 | +45 | +8.1 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 33 | 25 | +8 | +1.2 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 60 | 42 | +18 | +2.7 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 60 | 48 | +12 | +1.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 48 | 33 | +15 | +1.8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 62 | 40 | +22 | +1.8 |
| Total | 100% | 54 (F) | 37 (F) | +17 | +17.0 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Metaview | myInterview | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 13 | 3 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 7 | 6 | Sources on a separate domain |
Metaview has 16 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 13 with a source URL, 3 documented absences; myInterview has 13 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 7 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Metaview and myInterview sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 29 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 16 for Metaview, across 2 distinct source domains, and 13 for myInterview, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Metaview last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- myInterview last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next