§ The result
Pymetrics (Harver Games) leads micro1 on all 7 criteria.
Pymetrics (Harver Games) finishes 20 points clear of micro1 under rubric v1.0 — 56 against 36 — across the Assessment and Screening cohorts. Pymetrics (Harver Games) leads every one of the 7 criteria, micro1 none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Human Oversight Design, micro1 48 to Pymetrics (Harver Games) 50. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (micro1 20, Pymetrics (Harver Games) 80) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 55% of the weighted advantage Pymetrics (Harver Games) holds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
micro1
Zara, micro1's LLM-based AI interviewer, runs recorded, adaptive spoken interviews (with optional coding exercises and automated proctoring) and returns per-skill proficiency ratings, soft-skill ratings and a proctoring score; micro1 uses it to certify experts for its own AI-training talent network, and employers can use it through a client portal and API.
Vendor profile
Pymetrics (Harver Games)
Behavioral assessment using browser-based "games" that infer cognitive and emotional traits. Acquired by Harver in 2022 and folded into the Harver Games product line.
§ The record
micro1 is filed under Screening AI, Pymetrics (Harver Games) under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | micro1 | Pymetrics (Harver Games) |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2022 | 2013 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 55% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
micro1 20 · Pymetrics (Harver Games) 80
10.8 weighted points to Pymetrics (Harver Games)
20% weight · 75% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
micro1 50 · Pymetrics (Harver Games) 70
4.0 weighted points to Pymetrics (Harver Games)
15% weight · 86% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
micro1 45 · Pymetrics (Harver Games) 60
2.3 weighted points to Pymetrics (Harver Games)
12% weight · 92% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
micro1 25 · Pymetrics (Harver Games) 35
1.2 weighted points to Pymetrics (Harver Games)
8% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
micro1 45 · Pymetrics (Harver Games) 55
0.8 weighted points to Pymetrics (Harver Games)
15% weight · 99% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
micro1 22 · Pymetrics (Harver Games) 25
0.4 weighted points to Pymetrics (Harver Games)
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
micro1 48 · Pymetrics (Harver Games) 50
0.2 weighted points to Pymetrics (Harver Games)
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -19.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 19.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -20 beside that -19.7.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is micro1 minus Pymetrics (Harver Games).
| Category | Weight | micro1 | Pymetrics (Harver Games) | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 50 | 70 | -20 | -4.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 20 | 80 | -60 | -10.8 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 22 | 25 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 45 | 60 | -15 | -2.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 48 | 50 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 25 | 35 | -10 | -1.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 45 | 55 | -10 | -0.8 |
| Total | 100% | 36 (F) | 56 (F) | -20 | -19.7 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | micro1 | Pymetrics (Harver Games) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 7 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 25 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 9 | 2 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
micro1 has 33 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; Pymetrics (Harver Games) has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for micro1 and Pymetrics (Harver Games) sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 44 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 33 for micro1, across 3 distinct source domains, and 11 for Pymetrics (Harver Games), across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- micro1 last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Pymetrics (Harver Games) last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next