HomeComparemicro1 vs Textkernel

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

micro1 vs Textkernel

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Textkernel leads micro1 on all 7 criteria.

Textkernel finishes 15 points clear of micro1 under rubric v1.0 — 51 against 36 — across the Sourcing and Screening cohorts. Textkernel leads every one of the 7 criteria, micro1 none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Article 11 Technical Documentation, micro1 50 to Textkernel 55. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (micro1 20, Textkernel 55) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 42% of the weighted advantage Textkernel holds across the 7 criteria it leads.

§ The record

micro1 is filed under Screening AI, Textkernel under Candidate sourcing AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773 and Colorado AI Act. Only micro1 is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

Recordmicro1Textkernel
Price tierMidEnterprise
HeadquartersUSNL
Founded20222001

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 42% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    micro1 20 · Textkernel 55

    6.3 weighted points to Textkernel

  2. 12% weight · 54% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    micro1 25 · Textkernel 40

    1.8 weighted points to Textkernel

  3. 15% weight · 64% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    micro1 22 · Textkernel 32

    1.5 weighted points to Textkernel

  4. 15% weight · 74% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    micro1 45 · Textkernel 55

    1.5 weighted points to Textkernel

  5. 12% weight · 84% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    micro1 48 · Textkernel 60

    1.4 weighted points to Textkernel

  6. 8% weight · 93% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    micro1 45 · Textkernel 62

    1.4 weighted points to Textkernel

  7. 20% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    micro1 50 · Textkernel 55

    1.0 weighted points to Textkernel

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -14.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 14.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -15 beside that -14.9.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is micro1 minus Textkernel.

CategoryWeightmicro1TextkernelΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5055-5-1.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%2055-35-6.3
FRIA Support15%2232-10-1.5
Data Governance Disclosure15%4555-10-1.5
Human Oversight Design12%4860-12-1.4
Post-Market Monitoring12%2540-15-1.8
Customer Documentation8%4562-17-1.4
Total100%36 (F)51 (F)-15-14.9

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightmicro1Textkernel
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%12Sources on the vendor's own domain11—
Data Governance Disclosure15%41Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%70Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain30Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%22Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%31Sources on the vendor's own domain30Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%258Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain135Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain

micro1 has 33 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; Textkernel has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 13 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for micro1 sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 51 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 33 for micro1, across 3 distinct source domains, and 18 for Textkernel, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
micro1 last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Textkernel last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.