§ The result
Paycor leads Moonhub on all 7 criteria.
Paycor, filed under ATS-integrated, comes out 10 points above Moonhub, filed under Sourcing: 40 against 30 under rubric v1.0. Paycor takes all 7 criteria from Moonhub without a 20-point raw gap on any of them; the closest is FRIA Support, Moonhub 25 to Paycor 27. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: Customer Documentation (Moonhub 38, Paycor 55) and Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (Moonhub 30, Paycor 40), the second being 22% of the weighted advantage Paycor holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Moonhub
Moonhub is an AI recruiting platform whose agents (Qualify AI, Engage AI, Monitor AI) search, score, outreach to, and engage candidates across more than a billion public and proprietary profiles, working alongside human expert recruiters who vet candidates before presenting them.
Vendor profile
Paycor
Paycor, a Paychex company, sells a mid-market HR and payroll suite whose recruiting tools include the Paycor Recruiting ATS, Paycor Smart Sourcing (formerly Talenya), which uses AI to build a prioritized list of passive and active candidates for each role and automate outreach, and a WISE assistant that phone-screens candidates and scores their answers.
§ The record
Moonhub is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Paycor under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | Moonhub | Paycor |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2022 | 1990 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 22% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Moonhub 30 · Paycor 40
2.0 weighted points to Paycor
12% weight · 43% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Moonhub 22 · Paycor 38
1.9 weighted points to Paycor
15% weight · 59% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Moonhub 40 · Paycor 50
1.5 weighted points to Paycor
8% weight · 74% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Moonhub 38 · Paycor 55
1.4 weighted points to Paycor
18% weight · 88% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Moonhub 18 · Paycor 25
1.3 weighted points to Paycor
12% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Moonhub 48 · Paycor 55
0.8 weighted points to Paycor
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Moonhub 25 · Paycor 27
0.3 weighted points to Paycor
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -9.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 9.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -10 beside that -9.2.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Moonhub minus Paycor.
| Category | Weight | Moonhub | Paycor | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 30 | 40 | -10 | -2.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 18 | 25 | -7 | -1.3 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 27 | -2 | -0.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 40 | 50 | -10 | -1.5 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 48 | 55 | -7 | -0.8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 22 | 38 | -16 | -1.9 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 38 | 55 | -17 | -1.4 |
| Total | 100% | 30 (F) | 40 (F) | -10 | -9.2 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Moonhub | Paycor | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | — | 3 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 6 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 24 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Moonhub has 13 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 6 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Paycor has 30 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Paycor sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 43 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 13 for Moonhub, across 3 distinct source domains, and 30 for Paycor, across 6 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Moonhub last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Paycor last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next