§ The result
The Predictive Index leads Moonhub on all 7 criteria.
The Predictive Index finishes 18 points clear of Moonhub under rubric v1.0 — 48 against 30 — across the Assessment and Sourcing cohorts. The Predictive Index leads every one of the 7 criteria and 4 of them by 20 raw points or more, Bias Audit Transparency among them; Moonhub leads none. Bias Audit Transparency is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Moonhub 18, The Predictive Index 45, 18% weight), but it accounts for only 28% of the weighted advantage The Predictive Index holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Moonhub
Moonhub is an AI recruiting platform whose agents (Qualify AI, Engage AI, Monitor AI) search, score, outreach to, and engage candidates across more than a billion public and proprietary profiles, working alongside human expert recruiters who vet candidates before presenting them.
Vendor profile
The Predictive Index
The Predictive Index provides validated behavioral and cognitive psychometric assessments used to screen, hire, and develop employees and design teams, alongside AI-assisted talent-management software.
§ The record
Moonhub is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, The Predictive Index under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773. Only The Predictive Index is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Moonhub | The Predictive Index |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2022 | 1955 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 28% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Moonhub 18 · The Predictive Index 45
4.9 weighted points to The Predictive Index
20% weight · 51% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Moonhub 30 · The Predictive Index 50
4.0 weighted points to The Predictive Index
12% weight · 66% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Moonhub 22 · The Predictive Index 43
2.5 weighted points to The Predictive Index
15% weight · 78% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Moonhub 40 · The Predictive Index 55
2.3 weighted points to The Predictive Index
8% weight · 89% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Moonhub 38 · The Predictive Index 60
1.8 weighted points to The Predictive Index
15% weight · 97% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Moonhub 25 · The Predictive Index 35
1.5 weighted points to The Predictive Index
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Moonhub 48 · The Predictive Index 52
0.5 weighted points to The Predictive Index
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -17.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 17.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -18 beside that -17.4.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Moonhub minus The Predictive Index.
| Category | Weight | Moonhub | The Predictive Index | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 30 | 50 | -20 | -4.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 18 | 45 | -27 | -4.9 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 35 | -10 | -1.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 40 | 55 | -15 | -2.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 48 | 52 | -4 | -0.5 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 22 | 43 | -21 | -2.5 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 38 | 60 | -22 | -1.8 |
| Total | 100% | 30 (F) | 48 (F) | -18 | -17.4 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Moonhub | The Predictive Index | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 6 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 18 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
Moonhub has 13 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 6 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; The Predictive Index has 24 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 18 with a source URL, 6 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 37 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 13 for Moonhub, across 3 distinct source domains, and 24 for The Predictive Index, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Moonhub last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- The Predictive Index last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next