§ The result
Prevue HR leads Moonhub on all 7 criteria.
Prevue HR, filed under Assessment, comes out 14 points above Moonhub, filed under Sourcing: 44 against 30 under rubric v1.0. Of the 7 criteria Moonhub wins none, and the narrowest lead Prevue HR holds is on FRIA Support, Moonhub 25 to Prevue HR 27. Even Bias Audit Transparency, the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Moonhub 18, Prevue HR 44, 18% weight), is only 34% of the weighted advantage Prevue HR builds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Moonhub
Moonhub is an AI recruiting platform whose agents (Qualify AI, Engage AI, Monitor AI) search, score, outreach to, and engage candidates across more than a billion public and proprietary profiles, working alongside human expert recruiters who vet candidates before presenting them.
Vendor profile
Prevue HR
Prevue HR's psychometric platform tests candidates' aptitude, personality and motivations and compares the results with a custom role benchmark to produce a percentage Job Suitability score and Job-Fit report, alongside an optional applicant tracking system (APS Pro).
§ The record
Moonhub is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Prevue HR under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773. Only Prevue HR is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Moonhub | Prevue HR |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | CA |
| Founded | 2022 | 1994 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 34% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Moonhub 18 · Prevue HR 44
4.7 weighted points to Prevue HR
20% weight · 56% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Moonhub 30 · Prevue HR 45
3.0 weighted points to Prevue HR
12% weight · 72% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Moonhub 22 · Prevue HR 40
2.2 weighted points to Prevue HR
8% weight · 84% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Moonhub 38 · Prevue HR 58
1.6 weighted points to Prevue HR
15% weight · 93% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Moonhub 40 · Prevue HR 48
1.2 weighted points to Prevue HR
12% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Moonhub 48 · Prevue HR 54
0.7 weighted points to Prevue HR
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Moonhub 25 · Prevue HR 27
0.3 weighted points to Prevue HR
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -13.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 13.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -14 beside that -13.7.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Moonhub minus Prevue HR.
| Category | Weight | Moonhub | Prevue HR | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 30 | 45 | -15 | -3.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 18 | 44 | -26 | -4.7 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 27 | -2 | -0.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 40 | 48 | -8 | -1.2 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 48 | 54 | -6 | -0.7 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 22 | 40 | -18 | -2.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 38 | 58 | -20 | -1.6 |
| Total | 100% | 30 (F) | 44 (F) | -14 | -13.7 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Moonhub | Prevue HR | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | — | 3 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 6 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 28 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Moonhub has 13 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 6 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Prevue HR has 34 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Prevue HR sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 47 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 13 for Moonhub, across 3 distinct source domains, and 34 for Prevue HR, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Moonhub last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Prevue HR last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next