§ The result
Pymetrics (Harver Games) leads Moonhub on 6 of the 7 criteria.
Rubric v1.0 puts 26 points between Pymetrics (Harver Games) (Assessment) and Moonhub (Sourcing): 56 for Pymetrics (Harver Games), 30 for Moonhub. Pymetrics (Harver Games) leads 6 of the 7 criteria and the remaining criterion is level, so Moonhub is ahead on none of them; the closest of the 6 Pymetrics (Harver Games) leads is Human Oversight Design, Moonhub 48 to Pymetrics (Harver Games) 50. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Moonhub 18, Pymetrics (Harver Games) 80 — and at an 18% weight it carries 44% of the weighted advantage Pymetrics (Harver Games) holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Moonhub
Moonhub is an AI recruiting platform whose agents (Qualify AI, Engage AI, Monitor AI) search, score, outreach to, and engage candidates across more than a billion public and proprietary profiles, working alongside human expert recruiters who vet candidates before presenting them.
Vendor profile
Pymetrics (Harver Games)
Behavioral assessment using browser-based "games" that infer cognitive and emotional traits. Acquired by Harver in 2022 and folded into the Harver Games product line.
§ The record
Moonhub is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Pymetrics (Harver Games) under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773. Only Pymetrics (Harver Games) is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Moonhub | Pymetrics (Harver Games) |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2022 | 2013 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 44% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Moonhub 18 · Pymetrics (Harver Games) 80
11.2 weighted points to Pymetrics (Harver Games)
20% weight · 76% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Moonhub 30 · Pymetrics (Harver Games) 70
8.0 weighted points to Pymetrics (Harver Games)
15% weight · 88% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Moonhub 40 · Pymetrics (Harver Games) 60
3.0 weighted points to Pymetrics (Harver Games)
12% weight · 94% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Moonhub 22 · Pymetrics (Harver Games) 35
1.6 weighted points to Pymetrics (Harver Games)
8% weight · 99% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Moonhub 38 · Pymetrics (Harver Games) 55
1.4 weighted points to Pymetrics (Harver Games)
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Moonhub 48 · Pymetrics (Harver Games) 50
0.2 weighted points to Pymetrics (Harver Games)
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -25.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 25.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -26 beside that -25.3.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Moonhub minus Pymetrics (Harver Games).
| Category | Weight | Moonhub | Pymetrics (Harver Games) | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 30 | 70 | -40 | -8.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 18 | 80 | -62 | -11.2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 25 | - | - |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 40 | 60 | -20 | -3.0 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 48 | 50 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 22 | 35 | -13 | -1.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 38 | 55 | -17 | -1.4 |
| Total | 100% | 30 (F) | 56 (F) | -26 | -25.3 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Moonhub | Pymetrics (Harver Games) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | — | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 6 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 9 | 2 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Moonhub has 13 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 6 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Pymetrics (Harver Games) has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Pymetrics (Harver Games) sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 24 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 13 for Moonhub, across 3 distinct source domains, and 11 for Pymetrics (Harver Games), across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Moonhub last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Pymetrics (Harver Games) last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next