§ The result
Recruitee leads myInterview by 5 points.
Recruitee scores 42 and myInterview 37 under rubric v1.0, a 5-point gap across the ATS-integrated and Video interview cohorts. Recruitee leads 6 of the 7 criteria, including Data Governance Disclosure, while myInterview leads 1, including Bias Audit Transparency. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: Customer Documentation (myInterview 40, Recruitee 58) and Data Governance Disclosure at 15% (myInterview 42, Recruitee 52), the second being 25% of the weighted advantage Recruitee holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
myInterview
myInterview is an asynchronous one-way video interview platform that records candidate video responses and applies AI-assisted "Smart Shortlisting" and Big Five-based personality insights to help recruiters screen and rank applicants.
Vendor profile
Recruitee
Collaborative applicant tracking system, part of the Tellent group, with AI-assisted features for job-description generation, screening candidates against team-defined criteria, resurfacing past applicants, and summarizing evaluation feedback.
§ The record
myInterview is filed under Video interview AI, Recruitee under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773 and Colorado AI Act. Only myInterview is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | myInterview | Recruitee |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | AU | NL |
| Founded | 2014 | 2015 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
15% weight · 21% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
myInterview 42 · Recruitee 52
1.5 weighted points to Recruitee
8% weight · 42% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
myInterview 40 · Recruitee 58
1.4 weighted points to Recruitee
12% weight · 59% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
myInterview 48 · Recruitee 58
1.2 weighted points to Recruitee
18% weight · 72% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
myInterview 35 · Recruitee 30
0.9 weighted points to myInterview
12% weight · 84% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
myInterview 33 · Recruitee 40
0.8 weighted points to Recruitee
20% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
myInterview 38 · Recruitee 42
0.8 weighted points to Recruitee
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
myInterview 25 · Recruitee 27
0.3 weighted points to Recruitee
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -5.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 7.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -5 beside that -5.2.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is myInterview minus Recruitee.
| Category | Weight | myInterview | Recruitee | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 38 | 42 | -4 | -0.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 35 | 30 | +5 | +0.9 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 27 | -2 | -0.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 42 | 52 | -10 | -1.5 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 48 | 58 | -10 | -1.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 33 | 40 | -7 | -0.8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 40 | 58 | -18 | -1.4 |
| Total | 100% | 37 (F) | 42 (F) | -5 | -5.2 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | myInterview | Recruitee | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 1 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 7 | 6 | Sources on a separate domain | 14 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
myInterview has 13 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 7 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Recruitee has 21 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 14 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for myInterview sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 34 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 13 for myInterview, across 2 distinct source domains, and 21 for Recruitee, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- myInterview last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Recruitee last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next