§ The result
SEEK leads myInterview on all 7 criteria.
SEEK finishes 17 points clear of myInterview under rubric v1.0 — 54 against 37 — across the Screening and Video interview cohorts. Of the 7 criteria myInterview wins none, and the narrowest lead SEEK holds is on Bias Audit Transparency, myInterview 35 to SEEK 40. The advantage SEEK holds is spread out: Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (myInterview 38, SEEK 70, 20% weight), yet it supplies only 38% of the weighted points SEEK gains across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
myInterview
myInterview is an asynchronous one-way video interview platform that records candidate video responses and applies AI-assisted "Smart Shortlisting" and Big Five-based personality insights to help recruiters screen and rank applicants.
Vendor profile
SEEK
SEEK runs employment marketplaces in Australia, New Zealand and Southeast Asia (SEEK, Jobstreet and Jobsdb), and its seekAi employer tools label and rank applicants as 'high-fit' using a model trained on millions of past hirer shortlisting decisions, target job ads at predicted high-fit candidates, and run AI voice or text pre-screens, recommended shortlists and reference checks through a feature called Assist.
§ The record
myInterview is filed under Video interview AI, SEEK under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773 and Colorado AI Act. Only myInterview is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | myInterview | SEEK |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | AU | AU |
| Founded | 2014 | 1997 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 38% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
myInterview 38 · SEEK 70
6.4 weighted points to SEEK
15% weight · 55% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
myInterview 42 · SEEK 60
2.7 weighted points to SEEK
12% weight · 67% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
myInterview 33 · SEEK 50
2.0 weighted points to SEEK
8% weight · 78% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
myInterview 40 · SEEK 64
1.9 weighted points to SEEK
12% weight · 88% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
myInterview 48 · SEEK 62
1.7 weighted points to SEEK
15% weight · 95% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
myInterview 25 · SEEK 32
1.1 weighted points to SEEK
18% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
myInterview 35 · SEEK 40
0.9 weighted points to SEEK
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -16.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 16.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -17 beside that -16.7.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is myInterview minus SEEK.
| Category | Weight | myInterview | SEEK | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 38 | 70 | -32 | -6.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 35 | 40 | -5 | -0.9 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 32 | -7 | -1.1 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 42 | 60 | -18 | -2.7 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 48 | 62 | -14 | -1.7 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 33 | 50 | -17 | -2.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 40 | 64 | -24 | -1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 37 (F) | 54 (F) | -17 | -16.7 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | myInterview | SEEK | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 1 | 1 | — | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 7 | 6 | Sources on a separate domain | 23 | 7 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
myInterview has 13 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 7 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; SEEK has 30 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 23 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for myInterview and SEEK sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 43 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 13 for myInterview, across 2 distinct source domains, and 30 for SEEK, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- myInterview last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- SEEK last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next