§ The result
softgarden leads myInterview by 5 points.
Under rubric v1.0, softgarden, filed under ATS-integrated, finishes on 42 and myInterview, filed under Video interview, on 37, 5 points apart. softgarden leads 6 of the 7 criteria, including Data Governance Disclosure, while myInterview leads 1, including Bias Audit Transparency. The heaviest weighted swing runs the other way — myInterview takes Bias Audit Transparency at 18%, myInterview 35 to softgarden 22, 100% of the weighted advantage myInterview holds — while the widest raw gap sits on Customer Documentation, myInterview 40 to softgarden 58.
Vendor profile
myInterview
myInterview is an asynchronous one-way video interview platform that records candidate video responses and applies AI-assisted "Smart Shortlisting" and Big Five-based personality insights to help recruiters screen and rank applicants.
Vendor profile
softgarden
softgarden is a German cloud applicant tracking system (multiposting, career sites, applicant management and onboarding) with optional AI features: AI-Assisted Applicant Matching, which highlights applicants who closely match a job's requirements, and a newer LLM-based Screening Assistant, which scores each applicant against screening criteria.
§ The record
myInterview is filed under Video interview AI, softgarden under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773 and Colorado AI Act. Only myInterview is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | myInterview | softgarden |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | AU | DE |
| Founded | 2014 | 2001 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 24% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
myInterview 35 · softgarden 22
2.3 weighted points to myInterview
15% weight · 43% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
myInterview 42 · softgarden 54
1.8 weighted points to softgarden
8% weight · 58% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
myInterview 40 · softgarden 58
1.4 weighted points to softgarden
12% weight · 72% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
myInterview 33 · softgarden 44
1.3 weighted points to softgarden
12% weight · 84% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
myInterview 48 · softgarden 58
1.2 weighted points to softgarden
20% weight · 92% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
myInterview 38 · softgarden 42
0.8 weighted points to softgarden
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
myInterview 25 · softgarden 30
0.8 weighted points to softgarden
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -5.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 9.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -5 beside that -5.0.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is myInterview minus softgarden.
| Category | Weight | myInterview | softgarden | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 38 | 42 | -4 | -0.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 35 | 22 | +13 | +2.3 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 30 | -5 | -0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 42 | 54 | -12 | -1.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 48 | 58 | -10 | -1.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 33 | 44 | -11 | -1.3 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 40 | 58 | -18 | -1.4 |
| Total | 100% | 37 (F) | 42 (F) | -5 | -5.0 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | myInterview | softgarden | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 1 | 1 | — | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | — | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain | 7 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 5 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 7 | 6 | Sources on a separate domain | 31 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
myInterview has 13 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 7 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; softgarden has 36 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 31 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for myInterview sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 49 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 13 for myInterview, across 2 distinct source domains, and 36 for softgarden, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- myInterview last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- softgarden last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next