§ The result
2 points separate Workstream and myInterview.
Workstream holds a 2-point edge over myInterview under rubric v1.0, 39 to 37, across the Screening and Video interview cohorts. myInterview takes 1 of the 7 criteria, Bias Audit Transparency among them, against 6 for Workstream, whose share includes Human Oversight Design. The heaviest weighted swing runs the other way — myInterview takes Bias Audit Transparency at 18%, myInterview 35 to Workstream 20, 100% of the weighted advantage myInterview holds — while the widest raw gap sits on Customer Documentation, myInterview 40 to Workstream 56.
Vendor profile
myInterview
myInterview is an asynchronous one-way video interview platform that records candidate video responses and applies AI-assisted "Smart Shortlisting" and Big Five-based personality insights to help recruiters screen and rank applicants.
Vendor profile
Workstream
Workstream is a mobile-first HR, payroll and hiring platform for hourly, multi-location employers such as QSR franchisees. Its hiring suite pairs a text-to-apply applicant tracking system with VoiceAI phone screens and VideoAI asynchronous video interviews, which return transcripts, AI summaries, pass/fail results for each question and match scores.
§ The record
myInterview is filed under Video interview AI, Workstream under Screening AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Scheduling.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773, Mobley v. Workday and Colorado AI Act.
| Record | myInterview | Workstream |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | AU | US |
| Founded | 2014 | 2017 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 37% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
myInterview 35 · Workstream 20
2.7 weighted points to myInterview
12% weight · 59% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
myInterview 48 · Workstream 61
1.6 weighted points to Workstream
8% weight · 77% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
myInterview 40 · Workstream 56
1.3 weighted points to Workstream
15% weight · 87% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
myInterview 42 · Workstream 47
0.8 weighted points to Workstream
20% weight · 93% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
myInterview 38 · Workstream 40
0.4 weighted points to Workstream
15% weight · 97% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
myInterview 25 · Workstream 27
0.3 weighted points to Workstream
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
myInterview 33 · Workstream 35
0.2 weighted points to Workstream
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -1.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 7.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -2 beside that -1.8.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is myInterview minus Workstream.
| Category | Weight | myInterview | Workstream | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 38 | 40 | -2 | -0.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 35 | 20 | +15 | +2.7 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 27 | -2 | -0.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 42 | 47 | -5 | -0.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 48 | 61 | -13 | -1.6 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 33 | 35 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 40 | 56 | -16 | -1.3 |
| Total | 100% | 37 (F) | 39 (F) | -2 | -1.8 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | myInterview | Workstream | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 1 | 1 | — | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | — | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 7 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 7 | 6 | Sources on a separate domain | 28 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
myInterview has 13 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 7 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Workstream has 34 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for myInterview and Workstream sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 47 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 13 for myInterview, across 2 distinct source domains, and 34 for Workstream, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- myInterview last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Workstream last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next