§ The result
4 points separate Prevue HR and Oleeo.
Prevue HR holds a 4-point edge over Oleeo under rubric v1.0, 44 to 40, across the Assessment and ATS-integrated cohorts. Oleeo takes 1 of the 7 criteria, Human Oversight Design among them, against 6 for Prevue HR, whose share includes Post-Market Monitoring. Post-Market Monitoring is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Oleeo 30, Prevue HR 40, 12% weight), but it accounts for only 31% of the weighted advantage Prevue HR holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Oleeo
Oleeo is an enterprise applicant tracking and talent acquisition platform that uses machine learning to score, rank, and screen candidates from resumes, applications, and assessment responses, with prescriptive interview and hire recommendations and a stated diversity/bias-mitigation focus.
Vendor profile
Prevue HR
Prevue HR's psychometric platform tests candidates' aptitude, personality and motivations and compares the results with a custom role benchmark to produce a percentage Job Suitability score and Job-Fit report, alongside an optional applicant tracking system (APS Pro).
§ The record
Oleeo is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Prevue HR under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only Prevue HR is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Oleeo | Prevue HR |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | GB | CA |
| Founded | 1995 | 1994 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
12% weight · 30% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Oleeo 30 · Prevue HR 40
1.2 weighted points to Prevue HR
20% weight · 55% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Oleeo 40 · Prevue HR 45
1.0 weighted points to Prevue HR
18% weight · 72% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Oleeo 40 · Prevue HR 44
0.7 weighted points to Prevue HR
15% weight · 84% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Oleeo 45 · Prevue HR 48
0.4 weighted points to Prevue HR
15% weight · 91% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Oleeo 25 · Prevue HR 27
0.3 weighted points to Prevue HR
8% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Oleeo 55 · Prevue HR 58
0.2 weighted points to Prevue HR
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Oleeo 55 · Prevue HR 54
0.1 weighted points to Oleeo
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -3.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 4.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -4 beside that -3.8.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Oleeo minus Prevue HR.
| Category | Weight | Oleeo | Prevue HR | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 40 | 45 | -5 | -1.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 40 | 44 | -4 | -0.7 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 27 | -2 | -0.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 45 | 48 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 54 | +1 | +0.1 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 40 | -10 | -1.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 55 | 58 | -3 | -0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 40 (F) | 44 (F) | -4 | -3.8 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Oleeo | Prevue HR | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 10 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 28 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Oleeo has 16 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Prevue HR has 34 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Prevue HR sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 50 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 16 for Oleeo, across 1 distinct source domain, and 34 for Prevue HR, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Oleeo last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Prevue HR last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next