§ The result
Oracle Recruiting leads Pulsifi on all 7 criteria.
Oracle Recruiting finishes 16 points clear of Pulsifi under rubric v1.0 — 49 against 33 — across the ATS-integrated and Assessment cohorts. Oracle Recruiting takes all 7 criteria and Pulsifi none of them; the nearest contest is Human Oversight Design, Oracle Recruiting 60 to Pulsifi 55. The advantage Oracle Recruiting holds is spread out: Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Oracle Recruiting 60, Pulsifi 30, 20% weight), yet it supplies only 38% of the weighted points Oracle Recruiting gains across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Oracle Recruiting
Oracle Recruiting (part of Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, formerly Oracle Recruiting Cloud) is an enterprise applicant tracking system whose embedded AI suggests and ranks candidates, finds similar candidates, and generates 0-5 generative-AI match ratings against job requisitions to assist recruiters.
Vendor profile
Pulsifi
Pulsifi gives candidates and employees 0-100 Role Fit and Organizational Fit scores that combine personality, work-interest, work-culture and cognitive assessments with AI resume and skills analysis, and uses the scores to rank people for hiring, internal mobility and succession.
§ The record
Oracle Recruiting is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Pulsifi under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only Pulsifi is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Oracle Recruiting | Pulsifi |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | SG |
| Founded | 1977 | 2017 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 38% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Oracle Recruiting 60 · Pulsifi 30
6.0 weighted points to Oracle Recruiting
15% weight · 58% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Oracle Recruiting 60 · Pulsifi 40
3.0 weighted points to Oracle Recruiting
18% weight · 69% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Oracle Recruiting 30 · Pulsifi 20
1.8 weighted points to Oracle Recruiting
15% weight · 79% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Oracle Recruiting 35 · Pulsifi 25
1.5 weighted points to Oracle Recruiting
12% weight · 88% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Oracle Recruiting 40 · Pulsifi 28
1.4 weighted points to Oracle Recruiting
8% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Oracle Recruiting 62 · Pulsifi 46
1.3 weighted points to Oracle Recruiting
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Oracle Recruiting 60 · Pulsifi 55
0.6 weighted points to Oracle Recruiting
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +15.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 15.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +16 beside that +15.6.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Oracle Recruiting minus Pulsifi.
| Category | Weight | Oracle Recruiting | Pulsifi | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 60 | 30 | +30 | +6.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 30 | 20 | +10 | +1.8 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 25 | +10 | +1.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 60 | 40 | +20 | +3.0 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 60 | 55 | +5 | +0.6 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 40 | 28 | +12 | +1.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 62 | 46 | +16 | +1.3 |
| Total | 100% | 49 (F) | 33 (F) | +16 | +15.6 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Oracle Recruiting | Pulsifi | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 2 | — | 3 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 13 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 26 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Oracle Recruiting has 16 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 13 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Pulsifi has 33 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 26 with a source URL, 7 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 49 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 16 for Oracle Recruiting, across 2 distinct source domains, and 33 for Pulsifi, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Oracle Recruiting last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Pulsifi last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next