§ The result
PageUp leads SeekOut on all 7 criteria.
PageUp (ATS-integrated) and SeekOut (Sourcing) are 30 points apart under rubric v1.0, 64 (D) for PageUp against 34 (F) for SeekOut. SeekOut leads none of the 7 criteria, and PageUp is ahead on 5 of them by 20 raw points or more, Article 11 Technical Documentation among them. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: Bias Audit Transparency (PageUp 80, SeekOut 40) and Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (PageUp 74, SeekOut 35), the second being 26% of the weighted advantage PageUp holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
PageUp
PageUp is an enterprise talent acquisition suite (ATS, recruitment marketing/CRM, onboarding, learning and performance). Its AI Skills Matching sorts each applicant's resume against skills taken from the job ad into five bands, from Excellent Match to Not a Match, and recruiters reach those results through Paige, its conversational assistant.
Vendor profile
SeekOut
Sourcing platform aggregating public profile data into a searchable talent index, with AI-assisted candidate matching and outreach.
§ The record
PageUp is filed under ATS-integrated AI, SeekOut under Candidate sourcing AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act. Only PageUp is in scope of Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | PageUp | SeekOut |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | AU | US |
| Founded | 1997 | 2017 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 26% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
PageUp 74 · SeekOut 35
7.8 weighted points to PageUp
18% weight · 51% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
PageUp 80 · SeekOut 40
7.2 weighted points to PageUp
15% weight · 65% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
PageUp 63 · SeekOut 35
4.2 weighted points to PageUp
12% weight · 77% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
PageUp 55 · SeekOut 25
3.6 weighted points to PageUp
12% weight · 85% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
PageUp 64 · SeekOut 45
2.3 weighted points to PageUp
15% weight · 92% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
PageUp 40 · SeekOut 25
2.3 weighted points to PageUp
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
PageUp 63 · SeekOut 35
2.2 weighted points to PageUp
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +29.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 29.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +30 beside that +29.6.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is PageUp minus SeekOut.
| Category | Weight | PageUp | SeekOut | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 74 | 35 | +39 | +7.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 80 | 40 | +40 | +7.2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 40 | 25 | +15 | +2.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 63 | 35 | +28 | +4.2 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 64 | 45 | +19 | +2.3 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 55 | 25 | +30 | +3.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 63 | 35 | +28 | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 64 (D) | 34 (F) | +30 | +29.6 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | PageUp | SeekOut | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 24 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 5 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
PageUp has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; SeekOut has 9 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 5 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for PageUp sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 37 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 28 for PageUp, across 2 distinct source domains, and 9 for SeekOut, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- PageUp last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- SeekOut last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next