§ The result
PageUp leads Teamtailor by 17 points.
Under rubric v1.0, PageUp opens a 17-point lead on Teamtailor, 64 (D) to 47 (F), with both scored in the ATS-integrated cohort. The 7 criteria split 6 to 1 in favour of PageUp: PageUp is ahead on Bias Audit Transparency and Teamtailor on FRIA Support. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — PageUp 80, Teamtailor 30 — and at an 18% weight it carries 52% of the weighted advantage PageUp holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
PageUp
PageUp is an enterprise talent acquisition suite (ATS, recruitment marketing/CRM, onboarding, learning and performance). Its AI Skills Matching sorts each applicant's resume against skills taken from the job ad into five bands, from Excellent Match to Not a Match, and recruiters reach those results through Paige, its conversational assistant.
Vendor profile
Teamtailor
Teamtailor is a Stockholm-based applicant tracking and employer-branding platform whose OpenAI-powered "Co-pilot" assists recruiters with candidate screening, resume and interview summaries, talent-pool matching, interview-question generation, and AI-assisted job-ad and content writing.
§ The record
PageUp and Teamtailor are both filed under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | PageUp | Teamtailor |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | AU | SE |
| Founded | 1997 | 2013 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 51% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
PageUp 80 · Teamtailor 30
9.0 weighted points to PageUp
20% weight · 78% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
PageUp 74 · Teamtailor 50
4.8 weighted points to PageUp
12% weight · 87% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
PageUp 55 · Teamtailor 42
1.6 weighted points to PageUp
12% weight · 94% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
PageUp 64 · Teamtailor 54
1.2 weighted points to PageUp
15% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
PageUp 63 · Teamtailor 58
0.8 weighted points to PageUp
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
PageUp 40 · Teamtailor 42
0.3 weighted points to Teamtailor
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
PageUp 63 · Teamtailor 62
0.1 weighted points to PageUp
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +17.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 17.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +17 beside that +17.1.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is PageUp minus Teamtailor.
| Category | Weight | PageUp | Teamtailor | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 74 | 50 | +24 | +4.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 80 | 30 | +50 | +9.0 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 40 | 42 | -2 | -0.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 63 | 58 | +5 | +0.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 64 | 54 | +10 | +1.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 55 | 42 | +13 | +1.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 63 | 62 | +1 | +0.1 |
| Total | 100% | 64 (D) | 47 (F) | +17 | +17.1 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | PageUp | Teamtailor | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 24 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 14 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
PageUp has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Teamtailor has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 14 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for PageUp sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 48 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 28 for PageUp, across 2 distinct source domains, and 20 for Teamtailor, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- PageUp last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Teamtailor last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next