§ The result
PageUp leads Turing on all 7 criteria.
Rubric v1.0 puts 28 points between PageUp (ATS-integrated) and Turing (Assessment): 64 (D) for PageUp, 36 (F) for Turing. PageUp leads every one of the 7 criteria and 3 of them by 20 raw points or more, Bias Audit Transparency among them; Turing leads none. The advantage PageUp holds is spread out: Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (PageUp 80, Turing 28, 18% weight), yet it supplies only 34% of the weighted points PageUp gains across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
PageUp
PageUp is an enterprise talent acquisition suite (ATS, recruitment marketing/CRM, onboarding, learning and performance). Its AI Skills Matching sorts each applicant's resume against skills taken from the job ad into five bands, from Excellent Match to Not a Match, and recruiters reach those results through Paige, its conversational assistant.
Vendor profile
Turing
Turing is an AI-powered talent platform that vets software engineers through automated multi-stage technical assessments and uses machine-learned ranking to score, match, and place them with client companies.
§ The record
PageUp is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Turing under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only Turing is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | PageUp | Turing |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | AU | US |
| Founded | 1997 | 2018 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 34% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
PageUp 80 · Turing 28
9.4 weighted points to PageUp
20% weight · 57% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
PageUp 74 · Turing 42
6.4 weighted points to PageUp
12% weight · 69% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
PageUp 55 · Turing 27
3.4 weighted points to PageUp
15% weight · 79% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
PageUp 63 · Turing 44
2.9 weighted points to PageUp
12% weight · 88% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
PageUp 64 · Turing 45
2.3 weighted points to PageUp
15% weight · 96% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
PageUp 40 · Turing 25
2.3 weighted points to PageUp
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
PageUp 63 · Turing 48
1.2 weighted points to PageUp
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +27.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 27.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +28 beside that +27.7.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is PageUp minus Turing.
| Category | Weight | PageUp | Turing | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 74 | 42 | +32 | +6.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 80 | 28 | +52 | +9.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 40 | 25 | +15 | +2.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 63 | 44 | +19 | +2.9 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 64 | 45 | +19 | +2.3 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 55 | 27 | +28 | +3.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 63 | 48 | +15 | +1.2 |
| Total | 100% | 64 (D) | 36 (F) | +28 | +27.7 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | PageUp | Turing | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 24 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 8 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
PageUp has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Turing has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 8 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for PageUp sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 42 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 28 for PageUp, across 2 distinct source domains, and 14 for Turing, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- PageUp last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Turing last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next