Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Paradox vs Pinpoint
Side-by-side scores and evidence under the HireAIScore rubric v1.0. Click a vendor name to jump to the full profile and the cited evidence behind each score.
Export comparison (CSV)Pro→Vendor profile
Paradox
Conversational AI ("Olivia") that screens, schedules, and engages candidates over chat and SMS, often deployed on top of an existing ATS.
Vendor profile
Pinpoint
Pinpoint is an applicant tracking system for in-house talent teams that layers AI-assisted screening onto core hiring workflows — candidate match scores, AI filters, anonymized screening, an interview notetaker, and a hiring copilot for outreach and rejections.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Paradox minus Pinpoint.
| Category | Weight | Paradox | Pinpoint | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 40 | 72 | -32 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 50 | 42 | +8 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 38 | -13 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 45 | 68 | -23 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 50 | 64 | -14 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 35 | 52 | -17 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 45 | 66 | -21 |
| Total | 100% | 41 (F) | 57 (F) | -16 |
§ Evidence summary
Evidence count
Paradox
10 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 5
- absence
- 2
- audit report
- 1
- public statement
- 2
Evidence count
Pinpoint
20 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 13
- public statement
- 5
- absence
- 2