Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Paradox vs Sapia.ai
Side-by-side scores and evidence under the HireAIScore rubric v1.0. Click a vendor name to jump to the full profile and the cited evidence behind each score.
Vendor profile
Paradox
Conversational AI ("Olivia") that screens, schedules, and engages candidates over chat and SMS, often deployed on top of an existing ATS.
41
FSubstantial gaps
Vendor profile
Sapia.ai
Structured, text-based chat interview that scores candidates on personality (HEXACO) and competency traits — with no video, audio, or demographic data used.
56
FSubstantial gaps
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Paradox minus Sapia.ai.
| Category | Weight | Paradox | Sapia.ai | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 40 | 70 | -30 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 50 | 52 | -2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 35 | -10 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 45 | 62 | -17 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 50 | 62 | -12 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 35 | 50 | -15 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 45 | 62 | -17 |
| Total | 100% | 41 (F) | 56 (F) | -15 |
§ Evidence summary
Evidence count
Paradox
10 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 5
- absence
- 2
- audit report
- 1
- public statement
- 2
Evidence count
Sapia.ai
20 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 14
- absence
- 4
- audit report
- 2