Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Paradox vs SeekOut
Side-by-side scores and evidence under the HireAIScore rubric v1.0. Click a vendor name to jump to the full profile and the cited evidence behind each score.
Vendor profile
Paradox
Conversational AI ("Olivia") that screens, schedules, and engages candidates over chat and SMS, often deployed on top of an existing ATS.
41
FSubstantial gaps
Vendor profile
SeekOut
Sourcing platform aggregating public profile data into a searchable talent index, with AI-assisted candidate matching and outreach.
34
FSubstantial gaps
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Paradox minus SeekOut.
| Category | Weight | Paradox | SeekOut | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 40 | 35 | +5 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 50 | 40 | +10 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 25 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 45 | 35 | +10 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 50 | 45 | +5 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 35 | 25 | +10 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 45 | 35 | +10 |
| Total | 100% | 41 (F) | 34 (F) | +7 |
§ Evidence summary
Evidence count
Paradox
10 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 5
- absence
- 2
- audit report
- 1
- public statement
- 2
Evidence count
SeekOut
9 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 4
- absence
- 4
- public statement
- 1