Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Paradox vs SHL
Side-by-side scores and evidence under the HireAIScore rubric v1.0. Click a vendor name to jump to the full profile and the cited evidence behind each score.
Vendor profile
Paradox
Conversational AI ("Olivia") that screens, schedules, and engages candidates over chat and SMS, often deployed on top of an existing ATS.
41
FSubstantial gaps
Vendor profile
SHL
SHL is a global talent-assessment provider offering AI-scored cognitive ability, personality, behavioral, situational-judgement, coding, and video-interview assessments that score, rank, and recommend candidates for hiring and development decisions.
51
FSubstantial gaps
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Paradox minus SHL.
| Category | Weight | Paradox | SHL | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 40 | 60 | -20 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 50 | 50 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 30 | -5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 45 | 58 | -13 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 50 | 58 | -8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 35 | 40 | -5 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 45 | 60 | -15 |
| Total | 100% | 41 (F) | 51 (F) | -10 |
§ Evidence summary
Evidence count
Paradox
10 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 5
- absence
- 2
- audit report
- 1
- public statement
- 2
Evidence count
SHL
19 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 15
- absence
- 4