Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Paradox vs Thomas International
Side-by-side scores and evidence under the HireAIScore rubric v1.0. Click a vendor name to jump to the full profile and the cited evidence behind each score.
Vendor profile
Paradox
Conversational AI ("Olivia") that screens, schedules, and engages candidates over chat and SMS, often deployed on top of an existing ATS.
41
FSubstantial gaps
Vendor profile
Thomas International
Thomas International provides psychometric and aptitude assessments (behaviour/DISC, cognitive ability, personality and emotional intelligence) with an AI coaching layer, used for hiring, candidate selection and employee development.
48
FSubstantial gaps
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Paradox minus Thomas International.
| Category | Weight | Paradox | Thomas International | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 40 | 54 | -14 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 50 | 43 | +7 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 33 | -8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 45 | 57 | -12 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 50 | 51 | -1 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 35 | 40 | -5 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 45 | 60 | -15 |
| Total | 100% | 41 (F) | 48 (F) | -7 |
§ Evidence summary
Evidence count
Paradox
10 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 5
- absence
- 2
- audit report
- 1
- public statement
- 2
Evidence count
Thomas International
17 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 11
- absence
- 6