Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Paradox vs Turing
Side-by-side scores and evidence under the HireAIScore rubric v1.0. Click a vendor name to jump to the full profile and the cited evidence behind each score.
Export comparison (CSV)Pro→Vendor profile
Paradox
Conversational AI ("Olivia") that screens, schedules, and engages candidates over chat and SMS, often deployed on top of an existing ATS.
41
FSubstantial gaps
Vendor profile
Turing
Turing is an AI-powered talent platform that vets software engineers through automated multi-stage technical assessments and uses machine-learned ranking to score, match, and place them with client companies.
36
FSubstantial gaps
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Paradox minus Turing.
| Category | Weight | Paradox | Turing | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 40 | 42 | -2 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 50 | 28 | +22 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 25 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 45 | 44 | +1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 50 | 45 | +5 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 35 | 27 | +8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 45 | 48 | -3 |
| Total | 100% | 41 (F) | 36 (F) | +5 |
§ Evidence summary
Evidence count
Paradox
10 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 5
- absence
- 2
- audit report
- 1
- public statement
- 2
Evidence count
Turing
14 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 6
- absence
- 7
- public statement
- 1