HomeComparePaylocity vs Pin

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Paylocity vs Pin

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

3 points separate Paylocity and Pin.

Paylocity (ATS-integrated) edges Pin (Sourcing) by 3 points under rubric v1.0, 43 to 40. Paylocity leads 3 of the 7 criteria, including Article 11 Technical Documentation, while Pin leads 2, including Bias Audit Transparency, and 2 are level. One criterion, Article 11 Technical Documentation, is both the widest raw gap (Paylocity 44, Pin 30) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 20% weight it makes up 77% of the weighted advantage Paylocity holds across the 3 criteria it leads.

§ The record

Paylocity is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Pin under Candidate sourcing AI. They also share 2 secondary categories: Scheduling and Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only Paylocity is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordPaylocityPin
Price tierMidLow
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded19972024

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 64% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Paylocity 44 · Pin 30

    2.8 weighted points to Paylocity

  2. 15% weight · 78% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Paylocity 54 · Pin 50

    0.6 weighted points to Paylocity

  3. 18% weight · 86% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Paylocity 33 · Pin 35

    0.4 weighted points to Pin

  4. 12% weight · 94% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Paylocity 42 · Pin 45

    0.4 weighted points to Pin

  5. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Paylocity 58 · Pin 55

    0.2 weighted points to Paylocity

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 5 figures above sum to +2.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 4.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +3 beside that +2.9.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Paylocity minus Pin.

CategoryWeightPaylocityPinΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%4430+14+2.8
Bias Audit Transparency18%3335-2-0.4
FRIA Support15%3030--
Data Governance Disclosure15%5450+4+0.6
Human Oversight Design12%5050--
Post-Market Monitoring12%4245-3-0.4
Customer Documentation8%5855+3+0.2
Total100%43 (F)40 (F)+3+2.9

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightPaylocityPin
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%21Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%11—31Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain70Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain60Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%11Sources on the vendor's own domain51Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%21Sources on the vendor's own domain51Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%117Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain325Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain

Paylocity has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Pin has 37 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 32 with a source URL, 5 documented absences.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 55 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 18 for Paylocity, across 2 distinct source domains, and 37 for Pin, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
Paylocity last reviewed
July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Pin last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.