HomeComparePaylocity vs Saville Assessment

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Paylocity vs Saville Assessment

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Saville Assessment leads Paylocity by 5 points.

Saville Assessment scores 48 and Paylocity 43 under rubric v1.0, a 5-point gap across the Assessment and ATS-integrated cohorts. Saville Assessment leads 6 of the 7 criteria, including Bias Audit Transparency, while Paylocity leads 1, including Post-Market Monitoring. FRIA Support is the widest raw gap (Paylocity 30, Saville Assessment 40) but not the heaviest weighted swing, which is Bias Audit Transparency at 18% (Paylocity 33, Saville Assessment 42), 31% of the weighted advantage Saville Assessment builds across the 6 criteria it leads.

§ The record

Paylocity is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Saville Assessment under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act, Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.

RecordPaylocitySaville Assessment
Price tierMidEnterprise
HeadquartersUSGB
Founded19972004

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 28% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Paylocity 33 · Saville Assessment 42

    1.6 weighted points to Saville Assessment

  2. 15% weight · 55% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Paylocity 30 · Saville Assessment 40

    1.5 weighted points to Saville Assessment

  3. 20% weight · 76% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Paylocity 44 · Saville Assessment 50

    1.2 weighted points to Saville Assessment

  4. 12% weight · 86% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Paylocity 50 · Saville Assessment 55

    0.6 weighted points to Saville Assessment

  5. 12% weight · 95% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Paylocity 42 · Saville Assessment 38

    0.5 weighted points to Paylocity

  6. 8% weight · 97% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Paylocity 58 · Saville Assessment 60

    0.2 weighted points to Saville Assessment

  7. 15% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Paylocity 54 · Saville Assessment 55

    0.1 weighted points to Saville Assessment

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -4.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 5.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -5 beside that -4.8.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Paylocity minus Saville Assessment.

CategoryWeightPaylocitySaville AssessmentΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%4450-6-1.2
Bias Audit Transparency18%3342-9-1.6
FRIA Support15%3040-10-1.5
Data Governance Disclosure15%5455-1-0.1
Human Oversight Design12%5055-5-0.6
Post-Market Monitoring12%4238+4+0.5
Customer Documentation8%5860-2-0.2
Total100%43 (F)48 (F)-5-4.8

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightPaylocitySaville Assessment
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%21Sources on the vendor's own domain51Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%11—41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain51Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain60Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%11Sources on the vendor's own domain51Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%21Sources on the vendor's own domain61Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%117Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain346Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Paylocity has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Saville Assessment has 40 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 34 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Saville Assessment sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 58 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 18 for Paylocity, across 2 distinct source domains, and 40 for Saville Assessment, across 2 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Paylocity last reviewed
July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Saville Assessment last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.