§ The result
Pinpoint leads Toggl Hire on all 7 criteria.
Pinpoint finishes 20 points clear of Toggl Hire under rubric v1.0 — 57 against 37 — across the ATS-integrated and Assessment cohorts. Pinpoint leads every one of the 7 criteria, Toggl Hire none of them, and the closest of the 7 is FRIA Support, Pinpoint 38 to Toggl Hire 30. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Pinpoint 72, Toggl Hire 30 — and at a 20% weight it carries 41% of the weighted advantage Pinpoint holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Pinpoint
Pinpoint is an applicant tracking system for in-house talent teams that layers AI-assisted screening onto core hiring workflows - candidate match scores, AI filters, anonymized screening, an interview notetaker, and a hiring copilot for outreach and rejections.
Vendor profile
Toggl Hire
Toggl Hire is a skills-first hiring platform (now being retired) that screens candidates with auto-graded skills tests, async video interviews and homework assignments, bundled with a lightweight ATS.
§ The record
Pinpoint is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Toggl Hire under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only Toggl Hire is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Pinpoint | Toggl Hire |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Low |
| Headquarters | JE | EE |
| Founded | 2017 | 2013 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 41% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Pinpoint 72 · Toggl Hire 30
8.4 weighted points to Pinpoint
18% weight · 61% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Pinpoint 42 · Toggl Hire 20
4.0 weighted points to Pinpoint
12% weight · 71% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Pinpoint 52 · Toggl Hire 35
2.0 weighted points to Pinpoint
15% weight · 81% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Pinpoint 68 · Toggl Hire 55
1.9 weighted points to Pinpoint
12% weight · 88% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Pinpoint 64 · Toggl Hire 52
1.4 weighted points to Pinpoint
8% weight · 94% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Pinpoint 66 · Toggl Hire 50
1.3 weighted points to Pinpoint
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Pinpoint 38 · Toggl Hire 30
1.2 weighted points to Pinpoint
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +20.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 20.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +20 beside that +20.3.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Pinpoint minus Toggl Hire.
| Category | Weight | Pinpoint | Toggl Hire | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 72 | 30 | +42 | +8.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 42 | 20 | +22 | +4.0 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 38 | 30 | +8 | +1.2 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 68 | 55 | +13 | +1.9 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 64 | 52 | +12 | +1.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 52 | 35 | +17 | +2.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 66 | 50 | +16 | +1.3 |
| Total | 100% | 57 (F) | 37 (F) | +20 | +20.3 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Pinpoint | Toggl Hire | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 18 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 10 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Pinpoint has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 18 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; Toggl Hire has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 4 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 34 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 20 for Pinpoint, across 2 distinct source domains, and 14 for Toggl Hire, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Pinpoint last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Toggl Hire last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next