§ The result
Pinpoint leads Turing on all 7 criteria.
Pinpoint finishes 21 points clear of Turing under rubric v1.0 — 57 against 36 — across the ATS-integrated and Assessment cohorts. Pinpoint leads every one of the 7 criteria and 3 of them by 20 raw points or more, Article 11 Technical Documentation among them; Turing leads none. Article 11 Technical Documentation is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Pinpoint 72, Turing 42, 20% weight), but it accounts for only 29% of the weighted advantage Pinpoint holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Pinpoint
Pinpoint is an applicant tracking system for in-house talent teams that layers AI-assisted screening onto core hiring workflows - candidate match scores, AI filters, anonymized screening, an interview notetaker, and a hiring copilot for outreach and rejections.
Vendor profile
Turing
Turing is an AI-powered talent platform that vets software engineers through automated multi-stage technical assessments and uses machine-learned ranking to score, match, and place them with client companies.
§ The record
Pinpoint is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Turing under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Sourcing.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only Turing is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Pinpoint | Turing |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | JE | US |
| Founded | 2017 | 2018 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 29% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Pinpoint 72 · Turing 42
6.0 weighted points to Pinpoint
15% weight · 46% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Pinpoint 68 · Turing 44
3.6 weighted points to Pinpoint
12% weight · 61% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Pinpoint 52 · Turing 27
3.0 weighted points to Pinpoint
18% weight · 73% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Pinpoint 42 · Turing 28
2.5 weighted points to Pinpoint
12% weight · 84% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Pinpoint 64 · Turing 45
2.3 weighted points to Pinpoint
15% weight · 93% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Pinpoint 38 · Turing 25
1.9 weighted points to Pinpoint
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Pinpoint 66 · Turing 48
1.4 weighted points to Pinpoint
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +20.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 20.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +21 beside that +20.8.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Pinpoint minus Turing.
| Category | Weight | Pinpoint | Turing | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 72 | 42 | +30 | +6.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 42 | 28 | +14 | +2.5 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 38 | 25 | +13 | +1.9 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 68 | 44 | +24 | +3.6 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 64 | 45 | +19 | +2.3 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 52 | 27 | +25 | +3.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 66 | 48 | +18 | +1.4 |
| Total | 100% | 57 (F) | 36 (F) | +21 | +20.8 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Pinpoint | Turing | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 18 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 8 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Pinpoint has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 18 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; Turing has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 8 with a source URL, 7 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 34 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 20 for Pinpoint, across 2 distinct source domains, and 14 for Turing, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Pinpoint last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Turing last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next