§ The result
The Predictive Index leads Pulsifi by 15 points.
The Predictive Index finishes 15 points clear of Pulsifi inside the Assessment cohort under rubric v1.0: 48 against 33. The Predictive Index leads 6 of the 7 criteria, including Bias Audit Transparency, while Pulsifi leads 1, including Human Oversight Design. The advantage The Predictive Index holds is spread out: Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (The Predictive Index 45, Pulsifi 20, 18% weight), yet it supplies only 30% of the weighted points The Predictive Index gains across the 6 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
The Predictive Index
The Predictive Index provides validated behavioral and cognitive psychometric assessments used to screen, hire, and develop employees and design teams, alongside AI-assisted talent-management software.
Vendor profile
Pulsifi
Pulsifi gives candidates and employees 0-100 Role Fit and Organizational Fit scores that combine personality, work-interest, work-culture and cognitive assessments with AI resume and skills analysis, and uses the scores to rank people for hiring, internal mobility and succession.
§ The record
The Predictive Index and Pulsifi are both filed under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | The Predictive Index | Pulsifi |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | SG |
| Founded | 1955 | 2017 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 29% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
The Predictive Index 45 · Pulsifi 20
4.5 weighted points to The Predictive Index
20% weight · 55% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
The Predictive Index 50 · Pulsifi 30
4.0 weighted points to The Predictive Index
15% weight · 69% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
The Predictive Index 55 · Pulsifi 40
2.3 weighted points to The Predictive Index
12% weight · 81% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
The Predictive Index 43 · Pulsifi 28
1.8 weighted points to The Predictive Index
15% weight · 90% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
The Predictive Index 35 · Pulsifi 25
1.5 weighted points to The Predictive Index
8% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
The Predictive Index 60 · Pulsifi 46
1.1 weighted points to The Predictive Index
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
The Predictive Index 52 · Pulsifi 55
0.4 weighted points to Pulsifi
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +14.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 15.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +15 beside that +14.8.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is The Predictive Index minus Pulsifi.
| Category | Weight | The Predictive Index | Pulsifi | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 50 | 30 | +20 | +4.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 45 | 20 | +25 | +4.5 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 25 | +10 | +1.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 55 | 40 | +15 | +2.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 52 | 55 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 43 | 28 | +15 | +1.8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 46 | +14 | +1.1 |
| Total | 100% | 48 (F) | 33 (F) | +15 | +14.8 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | The Predictive Index | Pulsifi | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 18 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 26 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
The Predictive Index has 24 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 18 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Pulsifi has 33 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 26 with a source URL, 7 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 57 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 24 for The Predictive Index, across 1 distinct source domain, and 33 for Pulsifi, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- The Predictive Index last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Pulsifi last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next