§ The result
Prevue HR takes the total, Recruit CRM takes more of the criteria.
Prevue HR (Assessment) edges Recruit CRM (ATS-integrated) by 4 points under rubric v1.0, 44 to 40. Recruit CRM leads more of the criteria than Prevue HR — 5 to 2 — but Bias Audit Transparency, which Prevue HR leads, carries 18% of the rubric, and the weighted sum still falls to Prevue HR. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (Prevue HR 44, Recruit CRM 20) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 66% of the weighted advantage Prevue HR holds across the 2 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Prevue HR
Prevue HR's psychometric platform tests candidates' aptitude, personality and motivations and compares the results with a custom role benchmark to produce a percentage Job Suitability score and Job-Fit report, alongside an optional applicant tracking system (APS Pro).
Vendor profile
Recruit CRM
Recruit CRM is an ATS and CRM for recruitment agencies and executive search firms, with AI resume parsing, AI sourcing from an 800M+ profile Global Database, and AI candidate matching that scores and ranks candidates 0–100 with explanations for each dimension.
§ The record
Prevue HR is filed under Assessment AI, Recruit CRM under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Prevue HR is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Prevue HR | Recruit CRM |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Low |
| Headquarters | CA | US |
| Founded | 1994 | Not recorded |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 46% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Prevue HR 44 · Recruit CRM 20
4.3 weighted points to Prevue HR
20% weight · 70% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Prevue HR 45 · Recruit CRM 34
2.2 weighted points to Prevue HR
15% weight · 81% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Prevue HR 27 · Recruit CRM 34
1.1 weighted points to Recruit CRM
15% weight · 91% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Prevue HR 48 · Recruit CRM 54
0.9 weighted points to Recruit CRM
12% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Prevue HR 54 · Recruit CRM 58
0.5 weighted points to Recruit CRM
12% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Prevue HR 40 · Recruit CRM 42
0.2 weighted points to Recruit CRM
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Prevue HR 58 · Recruit CRM 60
0.2 weighted points to Recruit CRM
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +3.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 9.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +4 beside that +3.7.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Prevue HR minus Recruit CRM.
| Category | Weight | Prevue HR | Recruit CRM | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 45 | 34 | +11 | +2.2 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 44 | 20 | +24 | +4.3 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 27 | 34 | -7 | -1.1 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 48 | 54 | -6 | -0.9 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 54 | 58 | -4 | -0.5 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 40 | 42 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 58 | 60 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 44 (F) | 40 (F) | +4 | +3.7 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Prevue HR | Recruit CRM | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 28 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 30 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Prevue HR has 34 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Recruit CRM has 35 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 30 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Prevue HR and Recruit CRM sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 69 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 34 for Prevue HR, across 2 distinct source domains, and 35 for Recruit CRM, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Prevue HR last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Recruit CRM last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next