§ The result
Spark Hire leads Prevue HR by 9 points.
Under rubric v1.0, Spark Hire, filed under Video interview, finishes on 53 and Prevue HR, filed under Assessment, on 44, 9 points apart. The 7 criteria split 6 to 1 in favour of Spark Hire: Spark Hire is ahead on Bias Audit Transparency and Prevue HR on Post-Market Monitoring. The advantage Spark Hire holds is spread out: Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Prevue HR 44, Spark Hire 62, 18% weight), yet it supplies only 34% of the weighted points Spark Hire gains across the 6 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Prevue HR
Prevue HR's psychometric platform tests candidates' aptitude, personality and motivations and compares the results with a custom role benchmark to produce a percentage Job Suitability score and Job-Fit report, alongside an optional applicant tracking system (APS Pro).
Vendor profile
Spark Hire
Spark Hire is a hiring platform combining one-way (async) and live video interviewing with an applicant tracking system (via its Comeet acquisition), and adds AI features that score and rank candidates' resumes and one-way video responses to help recruiters prioritize submissions.
§ The record
Prevue HR is filed under Assessment AI, Spark Hire under Video interview AI. They also share 1 secondary category: ATS-integrated.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Prevue HR | Spark Hire |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | CA | US |
| Founded | 1994 | 2012 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 33% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Prevue HR 44 · Spark Hire 62
3.2 weighted points to Spark Hire
20% weight · 60% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Prevue HR 45 · Spark Hire 58
2.6 weighted points to Spark Hire
15% weight · 78% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Prevue HR 48 · Spark Hire 60
1.8 weighted points to Spark Hire
12% weight · 88% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Prevue HR 54 · Spark Hire 62
1.0 weighted points to Spark Hire
8% weight · 93% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Prevue HR 58 · Spark Hire 64
0.5 weighted points to Spark Hire
15% weight · 98% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Prevue HR 27 · Spark Hire 30
0.4 weighted points to Spark Hire
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Prevue HR 40 · Spark Hire 38
0.2 weighted points to Prevue HR
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -9.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 9.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -9 beside that -9.3.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Prevue HR minus Spark Hire.
| Category | Weight | Prevue HR | Spark Hire | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 45 | 58 | -13 | -2.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 44 | 62 | -18 | -3.2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 27 | 30 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 48 | 60 | -12 | -1.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 54 | 62 | -8 | -1.0 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 40 | 38 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 58 | 64 | -6 | -0.5 |
| Total | 100% | 44 (F) | 53 (F) | -9 | -9.3 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Prevue HR | Spark Hire | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | — | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 28 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 16 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Prevue HR has 34 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Spark Hire has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Prevue HR and Spark Hire sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 54 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 34 for Prevue HR, across 2 distinct source domains, and 20 for Spark Hire, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Prevue HR last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Spark Hire last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next