§ The result
X0PA AI leads Prevue HR on 5 of the 7 criteria.
X0PA AI holds a 4-point edge over Prevue HR under rubric v1.0, 48 to 44, with both scored in the Assessment cohort. X0PA AI leads 5 of the 7 criteria and the remaining 2 are level, so Prevue HR is ahead on none of them; the closest of the 5 X0PA AI leads is Customer Documentation, Prevue HR 58 to X0PA AI 60. FRIA Support is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Prevue HR 27, X0PA AI 38, 15% weight), but it accounts for only 38% of the weighted advantage X0PA AI holds across the 5 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Prevue HR
Prevue HR's psychometric platform tests candidates' aptitude, personality and motivations and compares the results with a custom role benchmark to produce a percentage Job Suitability score and Job-Fit report, alongside an optional applicant tracking system (APS Pro).
Vendor profile
X0PA AI
X0PA AI is a Singapore-based B2B AI recruitment platform (applicant tracking system) that sources, screens, scores, and ranks candidates using proprietary predictive-scoring models (BRIQ Score and Suitability Score) plus the X0PA ROOM video-interview/assessment product, marketed around bias-reduced, "responsible and explainable" AI hiring.
§ The record
Prevue HR and X0PA AI are both filed under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Prevue HR | X0PA AI |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | High |
| Headquarters | CA | SG |
| Founded | 1994 | 2017 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
15% weight · 38% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Prevue HR 27 · X0PA AI 38
1.6 weighted points to X0PA AI
15% weight · 65% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Prevue HR 48 · X0PA AI 56
1.2 weighted points to X0PA AI
20% weight · 88% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Prevue HR 45 · X0PA AI 50
1.0 weighted points to X0PA AI
12% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Prevue HR 54 · X0PA AI 57
0.4 weighted points to X0PA AI
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Prevue HR 58 · X0PA AI 60
0.2 weighted points to X0PA AI
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 5 figures above sum to -4.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 4.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -4 beside that -4.4.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Prevue HR minus X0PA AI.
| Category | Weight | Prevue HR | X0PA AI | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 45 | 50 | -5 | -1.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 44 | 44 | - | - |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 27 | 38 | -11 | -1.6 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 48 | 56 | -8 | -1.2 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 54 | 57 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 40 | 40 | - | - |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 58 | 60 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 44 (F) | 48 (F) | -4 | -4.4 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Prevue HR | X0PA AI | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 28 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 12 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Prevue HR has 34 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; X0PA AI has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Prevue HR and X0PA AI sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 52 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 34 for Prevue HR, across 2 distinct source domains, and 18 for X0PA AI, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Prevue HR last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- X0PA AI last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next