§ The result
TestGorilla leads Pulsifi on all 7 criteria.
Both filed under Assessment, TestGorilla and Pulsifi come out 47 and 33 under rubric v1.0, 14 points in favour of TestGorilla. Of the 7 criteria Pulsifi wins none, and the narrowest lead TestGorilla holds is on FRIA Support, Pulsifi 25 to TestGorilla 30. Even Article 11 Technical Documentation, the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Pulsifi 30, TestGorilla 52, 20% weight), is only 32% of the weighted advantage TestGorilla builds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Pulsifi
Pulsifi gives candidates and employees 0-100 Role Fit and Organizational Fit scores that combine personality, work-interest, work-culture and cognitive assessments with AI resume and skills analysis, and uses the scores to rank people for hiring, internal mobility and succession.
Vendor profile
TestGorilla
TestGorilla is a pre-employment skills-assessment platform offering a large test library plus AI features for resume scoring, candidate sourcing, and one-way/conversational AI video interviews to support skills-based hiring.
§ The record
Pulsifi and TestGorilla are both filed under Assessment AI. They also share 2 secondary categories: Screening and Video interview.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Pulsifi | TestGorilla |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | SG | NL |
| Founded | 2017 | 2019 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 32% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Pulsifi 30 · TestGorilla 52
4.4 weighted points to TestGorilla
18% weight · 56% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Pulsifi 20 · TestGorilla 38
3.2 weighted points to TestGorilla
15% weight · 74% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Pulsifi 40 · TestGorilla 56
2.4 weighted points to TestGorilla
12% weight · 83% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Pulsifi 28 · TestGorilla 38
1.2 weighted points to TestGorilla
8% weight · 90% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Pulsifi 46 · TestGorilla 58
1.0 weighted points to TestGorilla
15% weight · 96% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Pulsifi 25 · TestGorilla 30
0.8 weighted points to TestGorilla
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Pulsifi 55 · TestGorilla 60
0.6 weighted points to TestGorilla
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -13.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 13.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -14 beside that -13.6.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Pulsifi minus TestGorilla.
| Category | Weight | Pulsifi | TestGorilla | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 30 | 52 | -22 | -4.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 20 | 38 | -18 | -3.2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 30 | -5 | -0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 40 | 56 | -16 | -2.4 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 60 | -5 | -0.6 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 28 | 38 | -10 | -1.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 46 | 58 | -12 | -1.0 |
| Total | 100% | 33 (F) | 47 (F) | -14 | -13.6 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Pulsifi | TestGorilla | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 26 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 14 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Pulsifi has 33 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 26 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; TestGorilla has 19 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 14 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for TestGorilla sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 52 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 33 for Pulsifi, across 1 distinct source domain, and 19 for TestGorilla, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Pulsifi last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- TestGorilla last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next