HomeComparePymetrics (Harver Games) vs Recruit CRM

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Pymetrics (Harver Games) vs Recruit CRM

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Pymetrics (Harver Games) takes the total, Recruit CRM takes more of the criteria.

Pymetrics (Harver Games) finishes 16 points clear of Recruit CRM under rubric v1.0 — 56 against 40 — across the Assessment and ATS-integrated cohorts. Recruit CRM leads more of the criteria than Pymetrics (Harver Games) — 4 to 3 — but Bias Audit Transparency, which Pymetrics (Harver Games) leads, carries 18% of the rubric, and the weighted sum still falls to Pymetrics (Harver Games). One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (Pymetrics (Harver Games) 80, Recruit CRM 20) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 57% of the weighted advantage Pymetrics (Harver Games) holds across the 3 criteria it leads.

§ The record

Pymetrics (Harver Games) is filed under Assessment AI, Recruit CRM under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Pymetrics (Harver Games) is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.

RecordPymetrics (Harver Games)Recruit CRM
Price tierEnterpriseLow
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded2013Not recorded

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 48% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Pymetrics (Harver Games) 80 · Recruit CRM 20

    10.8 weighted points to Pymetrics (Harver Games)

  2. 20% weight · 80% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Pymetrics (Harver Games) 70 · Recruit CRM 34

    7.2 weighted points to Pymetrics (Harver Games)

  3. 15% weight · 86% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Pymetrics (Harver Games) 25 · Recruit CRM 34

    1.3 weighted points to Recruit CRM

  4. 12% weight · 90% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Pymetrics (Harver Games) 50 · Recruit CRM 58

    1.0 weighted points to Recruit CRM

  5. 15% weight · 94% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Pymetrics (Harver Games) 60 · Recruit CRM 54

    0.9 weighted points to Pymetrics (Harver Games)

  6. 12% weight · 98% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Pymetrics (Harver Games) 35 · Recruit CRM 42

    0.8 weighted points to Recruit CRM

  7. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Pymetrics (Harver Games) 55 · Recruit CRM 60

    0.4 weighted points to Recruit CRM

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +15.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 22.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +16 beside that +15.3.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Pymetrics (Harver Games) minus Recruit CRM.

CategoryWeightPymetrics (Harver Games)Recruit CRMΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%7034+36+7.2
Bias Audit Transparency18%8020+60+10.8
FRIA Support15%2534-9-1.3
Data Governance Disclosure15%6054+6+0.9
Human Oversight Design12%5058-8-1.0
Post-Market Monitoring12%3542-7-0.8
Customer Documentation8%5560-5-0.4
Total100%56 (F)40 (F)+16+15.3

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightPymetrics (Harver Games)Recruit CRM
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%20Sources on a separate domain51Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%20Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain21—
FRIA Support15%01—21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%10Sources on a separate domain60Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%10Sources on the vendor's own domain60Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%11—51Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%20Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%92Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain305Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Pymetrics (Harver Games) has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; Recruit CRM has 35 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 30 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Pymetrics (Harver Games) and Recruit CRM sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 46 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 11 for Pymetrics (Harver Games), across 3 distinct source domains, and 35 for Recruit CRM, across 2 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Pymetrics (Harver Games) last reviewed
May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Recruit CRM last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.