§ The result
Pymetrics (Harver Games) leads SeekOut on 6 of the 7 criteria.
Pymetrics (Harver Games) finishes 22 points clear of SeekOut under rubric v1.0 — 56 against 34 — across the Assessment and Sourcing cohorts. Pymetrics (Harver Games) leads 6 of the 7 criteria and the remaining criterion is level, so SeekOut is ahead on none of them; the closest of the 6 Pymetrics (Harver Games) leads is Human Oversight Design, Pymetrics (Harver Games) 50 to SeekOut 45. Bias Audit Transparency is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Pymetrics (Harver Games) 80, SeekOut 40, 18% weight), but it accounts for only 34% of the weighted advantage Pymetrics (Harver Games) holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Pymetrics (Harver Games)
Behavioral assessment using browser-based "games" that infer cognitive and emotional traits. Acquired by Harver in 2022 and folded into the Harver Games product line.
Vendor profile
SeekOut
Sourcing platform aggregating public profile data into a searchable talent index, with AI-assisted candidate matching and outreach.
§ The record
Pymetrics (Harver Games) is filed under Assessment AI, SeekOut under Candidate sourcing AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Pymetrics (Harver Games) is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Pymetrics (Harver Games) | SeekOut |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2013 | 2017 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 34% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Pymetrics (Harver Games) 80 · SeekOut 40
7.2 weighted points to Pymetrics (Harver Games)
20% weight · 67% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Pymetrics (Harver Games) 70 · SeekOut 35
7.0 weighted points to Pymetrics (Harver Games)
15% weight · 84% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Pymetrics (Harver Games) 60 · SeekOut 35
3.8 weighted points to Pymetrics (Harver Games)
8% weight · 92% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Pymetrics (Harver Games) 55 · SeekOut 35
1.6 weighted points to Pymetrics (Harver Games)
12% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Pymetrics (Harver Games) 35 · SeekOut 25
1.2 weighted points to Pymetrics (Harver Games)
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Pymetrics (Harver Games) 50 · SeekOut 45
0.6 weighted points to Pymetrics (Harver Games)
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +21.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 21.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +22 beside that +21.4.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Pymetrics (Harver Games) minus SeekOut.
| Category | Weight | Pymetrics (Harver Games) | SeekOut | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 70 | 35 | +35 | +7.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 80 | 40 | +40 | +7.2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 25 | - | - |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 60 | 35 | +25 | +3.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 50 | 45 | +5 | +0.6 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 35 | 25 | +10 | +1.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 55 | 35 | +20 | +1.6 |
| Total | 100% | 56 (F) | 34 (F) | +22 | +21.4 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Pymetrics (Harver Games) | SeekOut | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 1 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 9 | 2 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 5 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Pymetrics (Harver Games) has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; SeekOut has 9 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 5 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Pymetrics (Harver Games) sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 20 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 11 for Pymetrics (Harver Games), across 3 distinct source domains, and 9 for SeekOut, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Pymetrics (Harver Games) last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- SeekOut last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next