HomeComparePymetrics (Harver Games) vs SmartRecruiters

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Pymetrics (Harver Games) vs SmartRecruiters

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

SmartRecruiters leads Pymetrics (Harver Games) by 6 points.

SmartRecruiters scores 62 (D) and Pymetrics (Harver Games) 56 (F) under rubric v1.0, a 6-point gap across the ATS-integrated and Assessment cohorts. SmartRecruiters leads 5 of the 7 criteria, including FRIA Support, while Pymetrics (Harver Games) leads 1, including Bias Audit Transparency, and 1 is level. FRIA Support is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Pymetrics (Harver Games) 25, SmartRecruiters 45 — and at a 15% weight it carries 43% of the weighted advantage SmartRecruiters holds across the 5 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Pymetrics (Harver Games) is filed under Assessment AI, SmartRecruiters under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Pymetrics (Harver Games) is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordPymetrics (Harver Games)SmartRecruiters
Price tierEnterpriseEnterprise
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20132010

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 15% weight · 41% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Pymetrics (Harver Games) 25 · SmartRecruiters 45

    3.0 weighted points to SmartRecruiters

  2. 12% weight · 62% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Pymetrics (Harver Games) 35 · SmartRecruiters 48

    1.6 weighted points to SmartRecruiters

  3. 12% weight · 82% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Pymetrics (Harver Games) 50 · SmartRecruiters 62

    1.4 weighted points to SmartRecruiters

  4. 8% weight · 91% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Pymetrics (Harver Games) 55 · SmartRecruiters 63

    0.6 weighted points to SmartRecruiters

  5. 18% weight · 96% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Pymetrics (Harver Games) 80 · SmartRecruiters 78

    0.4 weighted points to Pymetrics (Harver Games)

  6. 15% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Pymetrics (Harver Games) 60 · SmartRecruiters 62

    0.3 weighted points to SmartRecruiters

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -6.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 7.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -6 beside that -6.6.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Pymetrics (Harver Games) minus SmartRecruiters.

CategoryWeightPymetrics (Harver Games)SmartRecruitersΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%7070--
Bias Audit Transparency18%8078+2+0.4
FRIA Support15%2545-20-3.0
Data Governance Disclosure15%6062-2-0.3
Human Oversight Design12%5062-12-1.4
Post-Market Monitoring12%3548-13-1.6
Customer Documentation8%5563-8-0.6
Total100%56 (F)62 (D)-6-6.6

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightPymetrics (Harver Games)SmartRecruiters
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%20Sources on a separate domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%20Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain10Audit reportSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%0111Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%10Sources on a separate domain20Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%10Sources on the vendor's own domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%1111Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%20Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%92Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain112Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Pymetrics (Harver Games) has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; SmartRecruiters has 13 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Pymetrics (Harver Games) and SmartRecruiters sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 24 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 11 for Pymetrics (Harver Games), across 3 distinct source domains, and 13 for SmartRecruiters, across 2 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Pymetrics (Harver Games) last reviewed
May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
SmartRecruiters last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.