§ The result
Pymetrics (Harver Games) leads TestDome by 19 points.
Pymetrics (Harver Games) finishes 19 points clear of TestDome inside the Assessment cohort under rubric v1.0: 56 against 37. The 7 criteria split 4 to 3 in favour of Pymetrics (Harver Games): Pymetrics (Harver Games) is ahead on Bias Audit Transparency and TestDome on FRIA Support. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (Pymetrics (Harver Games) 80, TestDome 15) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 59% of the weighted advantage Pymetrics (Harver Games) holds across the 4 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Pymetrics (Harver Games)
Behavioral assessment using browser-based "games" that infer cognitive and emotional traits. Acquired by Harver in 2022 and folded into the Harver Games product line.
Vendor profile
TestDome
TestDome sells pay-per-candidate online skills tests for coding, Excel and more than 100 other skills. The tests are scored automatically, and open-ended answers can be scored by AI. AI analysis of webcam and screen proctoring recordings flags possible cheating, and a live code-interview tool is included.
§ The record
Pymetrics (Harver Games) and TestDome are both filed under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Pymetrics (Harver Games) | TestDome |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Low |
| Headquarters | US | HR |
| Founded | 2013 | 2013 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 56% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Pymetrics (Harver Games) 80 · TestDome 15
11.7 weighted points to Pymetrics (Harver Games)
20% weight · 85% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Pymetrics (Harver Games) 70 · TestDome 40
6.0 weighted points to Pymetrics (Harver Games)
15% weight · 92% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Pymetrics (Harver Games) 60 · TestDome 50
1.5 weighted points to Pymetrics (Harver Games)
12% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Pymetrics (Harver Games) 35 · TestDome 30
0.6 weighted points to Pymetrics (Harver Games)
15% weight · 97% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Pymetrics (Harver Games) 25 · TestDome 28
0.4 weighted points to TestDome
8% weight · 99% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Pymetrics (Harver Games) 55 · TestDome 60
0.4 weighted points to TestDome
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Pymetrics (Harver Games) 50 · TestDome 52
0.2 weighted points to TestDome
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +18.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 20.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +19 beside that +18.7.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Pymetrics (Harver Games) minus TestDome.
| Category | Weight | Pymetrics (Harver Games) | TestDome | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 70 | 40 | +30 | +6.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 80 | 15 | +65 | +11.7 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 28 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 60 | 50 | +10 | +1.5 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 50 | 52 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 35 | 30 | +5 | +0.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 55 | 60 | -5 | -0.4 |
| Total | 100% | 56 (F) | 37 (F) | +19 | +18.7 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Pymetrics (Harver Games) | TestDome | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 1 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 9 | 2 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 27 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Pymetrics (Harver Games) has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; TestDome has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 27 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Pymetrics (Harver Games) sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 42 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 11 for Pymetrics (Harver Games), across 3 distinct source domains, and 31 for TestDome, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Pymetrics (Harver Games) last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- TestDome last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next