HomeComparePymetrics (Harver Games) vs Tribepad

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Pymetrics (Harver Games) vs Tribepad

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Pymetrics (Harver Games) and Tribepad tie at 56.

Pymetrics (Harver Games) (Assessment) and Tribepad (ATS-integrated) tie at 56 under rubric v1.0, arriving there from different criteria. Pymetrics (Harver Games) leads 3 of the 7 criteria and Tribepad 4, yet the two totals land on the same number. Article 11 Technical Documentation, at 20%, is the heaviest weighted swing and goes to Pymetrics (Harver Games) (Pymetrics (Harver Games) 70, Tribepad 56), 74% of the weighted advantage it holds, while the widest raw gap is Post-Market Monitoring, Pymetrics (Harver Games) 35 to Tribepad 54.

§ The record

Pymetrics (Harver Games) is filed under Assessment AI, Tribepad under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Pymetrics (Harver Games) is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordPymetrics (Harver Games)Tribepad
Price tierEnterpriseMid
HeadquartersUSGB
Founded20132008

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 35% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Pymetrics (Harver Games) 70 · Tribepad 56

    2.8 weighted points to Pymetrics (Harver Games)

  2. 12% weight · 64% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Pymetrics (Harver Games) 35 · Tribepad 54

    2.3 weighted points to Tribepad

  3. 12% weight · 76% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Pymetrics (Harver Games) 50 · Tribepad 58

    1.0 weighted points to Tribepad

  4. 15% weight · 85% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Pymetrics (Harver Games) 25 · Tribepad 30

    0.8 weighted points to Tribepad

  5. 15% weight · 92% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Pymetrics (Harver Games) 60 · Tribepad 56

    0.6 weighted points to Pymetrics (Harver Games)

  6. 18% weight · 97% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Pymetrics (Harver Games) 80 · Tribepad 78

    0.4 weighted points to Pymetrics (Harver Games)

  7. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Pymetrics (Harver Games) 55 · Tribepad 58

    0.2 weighted points to Tribepad

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -0.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 8.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads 0 beside that -0.5.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Pymetrics (Harver Games) minus Tribepad.

CategoryWeightPymetrics (Harver Games)TribepadΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%7056+14+2.8
Bias Audit Transparency18%8078+2+0.4
FRIA Support15%2530-5-0.8
Data Governance Disclosure15%6056+4+0.6
Human Oversight Design12%5058-8-1.0
Post-Market Monitoring12%3554-19-2.3
Customer Documentation8%5558-3-0.2
Total100%56 (F)56 (F)--0.5

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightPymetrics (Harver Games)Tribepad
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%20Sources on a separate domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%20Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain40Audit reportSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%01—21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%10Sources on a separate domain50Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Human Oversight Design12%10Sources on the vendor's own domain50Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%11—41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Customer Documentation8%20Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
All criteria100%92Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain284Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Pymetrics (Harver Games) has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; Tribepad has 32 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Pymetrics (Harver Games) and Tribepad sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 43 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 11 for Pymetrics (Harver Games), across 3 distinct source domains, and 32 for Tribepad, across 3 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Pymetrics (Harver Games) last reviewed
May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Tribepad last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.