HomeCompareRadancy vs Zoho Recruit

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Radancy vs Zoho Recruit

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

1 point separates Zoho Recruit and Radancy.

Zoho Recruit (ATS-integrated) edges Radancy (Sourcing) by 1 point under rubric v1.0, 42 to 41. Zoho Recruit leads 4 of the 7 criteria, including Bias Audit Transparency, while Radancy leads 2, including Human Oversight Design, and 1 is level. Human Oversight Design is at once the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing, and it belongs to Radancy — Radancy 57, Zoho Recruit 50, on a 12% weight — which is 65% of the weighted advantage Radancy holds across the 2 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Radancy is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Zoho Recruit under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act, Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.

RecordRadancyZoho Recruit
Price tierEnterpriseLow
HeadquartersUSIN
Founded20061996

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 12% weight · 25% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Radancy 57 · Zoho Recruit 50

    0.8 weighted points to Radancy

  2. 18% weight · 46% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Radancy 20 · Zoho Recruit 24

    0.7 weighted points to Zoho Recruit

  3. 20% weight · 64% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Radancy 42 · Zoho Recruit 45

    0.6 weighted points to Zoho Recruit

  4. 12% weight · 78% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Radancy 36 · Zoho Recruit 40

    0.5 weighted points to Zoho Recruit

  5. 15% weight · 91% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Radancy 58 · Zoho Recruit 55

    0.4 weighted points to Radancy

  6. 15% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Radancy 28 · Zoho Recruit 30

    0.3 weighted points to Zoho Recruit

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -0.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 3.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -1 beside that -0.8.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Radancy minus Zoho Recruit.

CategoryWeightRadancyZoho RecruitΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%4245-3-0.6
Bias Audit Transparency18%2024-4-0.7
FRIA Support15%2830-2-0.3
Data Governance Disclosure15%5855+3+0.4
Human Oversight Design12%5750+7+0.8
Post-Market Monitoring12%3640-4-0.5
Customer Documentation8%6060--
Total100%41 (F)42 (F)-1-0.8

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightRadancyZoho Recruit
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%21Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%21Sources on the vendor's own domain11
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%30Sources on the vendor's own domain21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%31Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%31Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%166Sources on the vendor's own domain107Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain

Radancy has 22 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Zoho Recruit has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 7 documented absences.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 39 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 22 for Radancy, across 1 distinct source domain, and 17 for Zoho Recruit, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
Radancy last reviewed
August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Zoho Recruit last reviewed
July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.