HomeCompareRecruit CRM vs Retorio

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Recruit CRM vs Retorio

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Retorio takes the total, Recruit CRM takes more of the criteria.

Retorio (Assessment) edges Recruit CRM (ATS-integrated) by 4 points under rubric v1.0, 44 to 40. Recruit CRM leads more of the criteria than Retorio — 5 to 2 — but Bias Audit Transparency, which Retorio leads, carries 18% of the rubric, and the weighted sum still falls to Retorio. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (Recruit CRM 20, Retorio 40) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 53% of the weighted advantage Retorio holds across the 2 criteria it leads.

§ The record

Recruit CRM is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Retorio under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act. Only Retorio is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.

RecordRecruit CRMRetorio
Price tierLowMid
HeadquartersUSDE
FoundedNot recorded2018

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 35% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Recruit CRM 20 · Retorio 40

    3.6 weighted points to Retorio

  2. 20% weight · 66% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Recruit CRM 34 · Retorio 50

    3.2 weighted points to Retorio

  3. 12% weight · 77% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Recruit CRM 42 · Retorio 33

    1.1 weighted points to Recruit CRM

  4. 8% weight · 84% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Recruit CRM 60 · Retorio 50

    0.8 weighted points to Recruit CRM

  5. 12% weight · 91% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Recruit CRM 58 · Retorio 52

    0.7 weighted points to Recruit CRM

  6. 15% weight · 97% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Recruit CRM 34 · Retorio 30

    0.6 weighted points to Recruit CRM

  7. 15% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Recruit CRM 54 · Retorio 52

    0.3 weighted points to Recruit CRM

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -3.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 10.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -4 beside that -3.3.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Recruit CRM minus Retorio.

CategoryWeightRecruit CRMRetorioΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%3450-16-3.2
Bias Audit Transparency18%2040-20-3.6
FRIA Support15%3430+4+0.6
Data Governance Disclosure15%5452+2+0.3
Human Oversight Design12%5852+6+0.7
Post-Market Monitoring12%4233+9+1.1
Customer Documentation8%6050+10+0.8
Total100%40 (F)44 (F)-4-3.3

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightRecruit CRMRetorio
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%51Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%21—31Audit reportSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%60Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%60Sources on the vendor's own domain30Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%51Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%41Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%305Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain166Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Recruit CRM has 35 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 30 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Retorio has 22 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Recruit CRM and Retorio sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 57 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 35 for Recruit CRM, across 2 distinct source domains, and 22 for Retorio, across 4 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Recruit CRM last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Retorio last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.