HomeCompareRecruit CRM vs SeekOut

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Recruit CRM vs SeekOut

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Recruit CRM leads SeekOut by 6 points.

Recruit CRM scores 40 and SeekOut 34 under rubric v1.0, a 6-point gap across the ATS-integrated and Sourcing cohorts. The 7 criteria split 5 to 2 in favour of Recruit CRM: Recruit CRM is ahead on Data Governance Disclosure and SeekOut on Bias Audit Transparency. SeekOut takes the heaviest weighted swing, Bias Audit Transparency at 18% (Recruit CRM 20, SeekOut 40), 95% of the weighted advantage it builds, while the widest raw gap is on Customer Documentation, Recruit CRM 60 to SeekOut 35.

§ The record

Recruit CRM is filed under ATS-integrated AI, SeekOut under Candidate sourcing AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act.

RecordRecruit CRMSeekOut
Price tierLowEnterprise
HeadquartersUSUS
FoundedNot recorded2017

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 26% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Recruit CRM 20 · SeekOut 40

    3.6 weighted points to SeekOut

  2. 15% weight · 47% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Recruit CRM 54 · SeekOut 35

    2.9 weighted points to Recruit CRM

  3. 12% weight · 62% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Recruit CRM 42 · SeekOut 25

    2.0 weighted points to Recruit CRM

  4. 8% weight · 77% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Recruit CRM 60 · SeekOut 35

    2.0 weighted points to Recruit CRM

  5. 12% weight · 89% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Recruit CRM 58 · SeekOut 45

    1.6 weighted points to Recruit CRM

  6. 15% weight · 99% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Recruit CRM 34 · SeekOut 25

    1.3 weighted points to Recruit CRM

  7. 20% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Recruit CRM 34 · SeekOut 35

    0.2 weighted points to SeekOut

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +6.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 13.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +6 beside that +6.0.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Recruit CRM minus SeekOut.

CategoryWeightRecruit CRMSeekOutΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%3435-1-0.2
Bias Audit Transparency18%2040-20-3.6
FRIA Support15%3425+9+1.3
Data Governance Disclosure15%5435+19+2.9
Human Oversight Design12%5845+13+1.6
Post-Market Monitoring12%4225+17+2.0
Customer Documentation8%6035+25+2.0
Total100%40 (F)34 (F)+6+6.0

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightRecruit CRMSeekOut
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%51Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%21—11—
FRIA Support15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain01—
Data Governance Disclosure15%60Sources on the vendor's own domain10Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%60Sources on the vendor's own domain10Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%51Sources on the vendor's own domain01—
Customer Documentation8%41Sources on the vendor's own domain10Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%305Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain54Sources on the vendor's own domain

Recruit CRM has 35 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 30 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; SeekOut has 9 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 5 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Recruit CRM sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 44 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 35 for Recruit CRM, across 2 distinct source domains, and 9 for SeekOut, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
Recruit CRM last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
SeekOut last reviewed
May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.