HomeCompareRecruit CRM vs Textkernel

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Recruit CRM vs Textkernel

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Textkernel leads Recruit CRM by 11 points.

Textkernel sits 11 points above Recruit CRM under rubric v1.0 — 51 against 40 — with Textkernel filed under Sourcing and Recruit CRM under ATS-integrated. Recruit CRM takes 2 of the 7 criteria, FRIA Support among them, against 5 for Textkernel, whose share includes Bias Audit Transparency. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (Recruit CRM 20, Textkernel 55) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 57% of the weighted advantage Textkernel holds across the 5 criteria it leads.

§ The record

Recruit CRM is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Textkernel under Candidate sourcing AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act. Only Textkernel is in scope of Illinois HB 3773.

RecordRecruit CRMTextkernel
Price tierLowEnterprise
HeadquartersUSNL
FoundedNot recorded2001

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 54% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Recruit CRM 20 · Textkernel 55

    6.3 weighted points to Textkernel

  2. 20% weight · 91% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Recruit CRM 34 · Textkernel 55

    4.2 weighted points to Textkernel

  3. 15% weight · 93% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Recruit CRM 34 · Textkernel 32

    0.3 weighted points to Recruit CRM

  4. 12% weight · 95% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Recruit CRM 58 · Textkernel 60

    0.2 weighted points to Textkernel

  5. 12% weight · 97% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Recruit CRM 42 · Textkernel 40

    0.2 weighted points to Recruit CRM

  6. 8% weight · 99% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Recruit CRM 60 · Textkernel 62

    0.2 weighted points to Textkernel

  7. 15% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Recruit CRM 54 · Textkernel 55

    0.1 weighted points to Textkernel

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -10.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 11.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -11 beside that -10.5.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Recruit CRM minus Textkernel.

CategoryWeightRecruit CRMTextkernelΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%3455-21-4.2
Bias Audit Transparency18%2055-35-6.3
FRIA Support15%3432+2+0.3
Data Governance Disclosure15%5455-1-0.1
Human Oversight Design12%5860-2-0.2
Post-Market Monitoring12%4240+2+0.2
Customer Documentation8%6062-2-0.2
Total100%40 (F)51 (F)-11-10.5

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightRecruit CRMTextkernel
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%51Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%21—21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain11—
Data Governance Disclosure15%60Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%60Sources on the vendor's own domain30Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%51Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%41Sources on the vendor's own domain30Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%305Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain135Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain

Recruit CRM has 35 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 30 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Textkernel has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 13 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Recruit CRM sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 53 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 35 for Recruit CRM, across 2 distinct source domains, and 18 for Textkernel, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
Recruit CRM last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Textkernel last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.