§ The result
Workday Recruiting AI leads Recruit CRM by 16 points.
Workday Recruiting AI finishes 16 points clear of Recruit CRM inside the ATS-integrated cohort under rubric v1.0: 56 against 40. Workday Recruiting AI leads 6 of the 7 criteria, including Article 11 Technical Documentation, while Recruit CRM leads 1, including Post-Market Monitoring. Workday Recruiting AI takes the heaviest weighted swing, Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (Recruit CRM 34, Workday Recruiting AI 70), which is 45% of the weighted advantage Workday Recruiting AI holds; the widest raw gap is a different criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, Recruit CRM 20 to Workday Recruiting AI 60.
Vendor profile
Recruit CRM
Recruit CRM is an ATS and CRM for recruitment agencies and executive search firms, with AI resume parsing, AI sourcing from an 800M+ profile Global Database, and AI candidate matching that scores and ranks candidates 0–100 with explanations for each dimension.
Vendor profile
Workday Recruiting AI
AI features built into Workday Recruiting, including candidate-skill matching and recruiter productivity tools, surfaced inside the Workday ATS.
§ The record
Recruit CRM and Workday Recruiting AI are both filed under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Sourcing.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act.
| Record | Recruit CRM | Workday Recruiting AI |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | Not recorded | 2005 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 43% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Recruit CRM 34 · Workday Recruiting AI 70
7.2 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
18% weight · 86% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Recruit CRM 20 · Workday Recruiting AI 60
7.2 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
12% weight · 91% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Recruit CRM 58 · Workday Recruiting AI 65
0.8 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
12% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Recruit CRM 42 · Workday Recruiting AI 35
0.8 weighted points to Recruit CRM
8% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Recruit CRM 60 · Workday Recruiting AI 65
0.4 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
15% weight · 99% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Recruit CRM 34 · Workday Recruiting AI 35
0.1 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Recruit CRM 54 · Workday Recruiting AI 55
0.1 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -15.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 16.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -16 beside that -15.1.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Recruit CRM minus Workday Recruiting AI.
| Category | Weight | Recruit CRM | Workday Recruiting AI | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 34 | 70 | -36 | -7.2 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 20 | 60 | -40 | -7.2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 34 | 35 | -1 | -0.1 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 54 | 55 | -1 | -0.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 58 | 65 | -7 | -0.8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 42 | 35 | +7 | +0.8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 65 | -5 | -0.4 |
| Total | 100% | 40 (F) | 56 (F) | -16 | -15.1 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Recruit CRM | Workday Recruiting AI | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 30 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 9 | 2 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
Recruit CRM has 35 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 30 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Workday Recruiting AI has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Recruit CRM sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 46 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 35 for Recruit CRM, across 2 distinct source domains, and 11 for Workday Recruiting AI, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Recruit CRM last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Workday Recruiting AI last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next