HomeCompareRetorio vs Spark Hire

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Retorio vs Spark Hire

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

Spark Hire leads Retorio on 6 of the 7 criteria.

Spark Hire scores 53 and Retorio 44 under rubric v1.0, a 9-point gap across the Video interview and Assessment cohorts. Spark Hire leads 6 of the 7 criteria and the remaining criterion is level, so Retorio is ahead on none of them; the closest of the 6 Spark Hire leads is Post-Market Monitoring, Retorio 33 to Spark Hire 38. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Retorio 40, Spark Hire 62 — and at an 18% weight it carries 41% of the weighted advantage Spark Hire holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Retorio is filed under Assessment AI, Spark Hire under Video interview AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.

RecordRetorioSpark Hire
Price tierMidMid
HeadquartersDEUS
Founded20182012

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 41% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Retorio 40 · Spark Hire 62

    4.0 weighted points to Spark Hire

  2. 20% weight · 57% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Retorio 50 · Spark Hire 58

    1.6 weighted points to Spark Hire

  3. 15% weight · 70% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Retorio 52 · Spark Hire 60

    1.2 weighted points to Spark Hire

  4. 12% weight · 82% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Retorio 52 · Spark Hire 62

    1.2 weighted points to Spark Hire

  5. 8% weight · 94% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Retorio 50 · Spark Hire 64

    1.1 weighted points to Spark Hire

  6. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Retorio 33 · Spark Hire 38

    0.6 weighted points to Spark Hire

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -9.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 9.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -9 beside that -9.7.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Retorio minus Spark Hire.

CategoryWeightRetorioSpark HireΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5058-8-1.6
Bias Audit Transparency18%4062-22-4.0
FRIA Support15%3030--
Data Governance Disclosure15%5260-8-1.2
Human Oversight Design12%5262-10-1.2
Post-Market Monitoring12%3338-5-0.6
Customer Documentation8%5064-14-1.1
Total100%44 (F)53 (F)-9-9.7

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightRetorioSpark Hire
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%21Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%31Audit reportSources on a separate domain30Audit reportSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%31Sources on the vendor's own domain30Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%30Sources on the vendor's own domain30Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%11Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%31Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
All criteria100%166Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain164Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Retorio has 22 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Spark Hire has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Retorio and Spark Hire sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 42 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 22 for Retorio, across 4 distinct source domains, and 20 for Spark Hire, across 2 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Retorio last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Spark Hire last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.