§ The result
Teal leads Rezi on 5 of the 7 criteria.
Teal scores 65 (D) and Rezi 59 (F) under rubric js-v1.0, a 6-point gap across the Tracker and Resume AI cohorts. Teal leads 5 of the 7 criteria and the remaining 2 are level, so Rezi is ahead on none of them; the closest of the 5 Teal leads is Pricing & Cancellation Fairness, Rezi 62 to Teal 66. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: Effectiveness Evidence (Rezi 32, Teal 44) and Data & Credential Safety at 20% (Rezi 58, Teal 68), the second being 33% of the weighted advantage Teal holds across the 5 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Rezi
Rezi is an AI resume builder that drafts and rewrites resume bullet points, summaries and cover letters, scores drafts against ATS formatting conventions with a 0-100 "Rezi Score", and adds a Chrome extension that autofills job applications on Workday, Greenhouse and Lever for the user to submit.
Vendor profile
Teal
Teal is a freemium platform for job seekers offering an AI resume builder, a job-application tracker/CRM, and resume-to-job-description keyword matching, plus a Chrome extension that saves postings from 40+ job boards; it does not auto-apply, so the user manually submits every application.
§ The record
Rezi is filed under Resume & profile AI, Teal under Application trackers. They also share 1 secondary category: Job matching.
| Record | Rezi | Teal |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | KR | US |
| Founded | 2015 | 2019 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 33% of the movement so far
Data & Credential Safety
Rezi 58 · Teal 68
2.0 weighted points to Teal
12% weight · 57% of the movement so far
Effectiveness Evidence
Rezi 32 · Teal 44
1.4 weighted points to Teal
15% weight · 77% of the movement so far
User Control & Transparency
Rezi 70 · Teal 78
1.2 weighted points to Teal
20% weight · 93% of the movement so far
Application Honesty
Rezi 55 · Teal 60
1.0 weighted points to Teal
10% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Pricing & Cancellation Fairness
Rezi 62 · Teal 66
0.4 weighted points to Teal
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 5 figures above sum to -6.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 6.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -6 beside that -6.0.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Rezi minus Teal.
| Category | Weight | Rezi | Teal | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application Honesty | 20% | 55 | 60 | -5 | -1.0 |
| Data & Credential Safety | 20% | 58 | 68 | -10 | -2.0 |
| User Control & Transparency | 15% | 70 | 78 | -8 | -1.2 |
| Employer & ATS Legitimacy | 15% | 68 | 68 | - | - |
| Effectiveness Evidence | 12% | 32 | 44 | -12 | -1.4 |
| Pricing & Cancellation Fairness | 10% | 62 | 66 | -4 | -0.4 |
| Support & Accountability | 8% | 70 | 70 | - | - |
| Total | 100% | 59 (F) | 65 (D) | -6 | -6.0 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Rezi | Teal | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Application Honesty | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data & Credential Safety | 20% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| User Control & Transparency | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Employer & ATS Legitimacy | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Effectiveness Evidence | 12% | 4 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | — |
| Pricing & Cancellation Fairness | 10% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Support & Accountability | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 0 | — |
| All criteria | 100% | 27 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 20 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Rezi has 34 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 27 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Teal has 22 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Rezi sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 56 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 34 for Rezi, across 6 distinct source domains, and 22 for Teal, across 4 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- js-v1.0
- Rezi last reviewed
- September 4, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Teal last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next
The full profiles
Scored against