§ The result
SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting leads Willo on 6 of the 7 criteria.
SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting sits 12 points above Willo under rubric v1.0 — 53 against 41 — with SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting filed under ATS-integrated and Willo under Video interview. SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting leads 6 of the 7 criteria and the remaining criterion is level, so Willo is ahead on none of them; the closest of the 6 SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting leads is Post-Market Monitoring, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 40 to Willo 36. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 70, Willo 38 — and at a 20% weight it carries 54% of the weighted advantage SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting is the recruiting module of SAP's cloud HCM suite, using AI (career-site skills matching, job-description generation, resume skills extraction and stack-ranking of applicants) delivered under SAP Business AI and the Joule assistant.
Vendor profile
Willo
Willo is a browser-based asynchronous (one-way) video interview platform that lets employers collect recorded video, audio, multiple-choice and written candidate responses, then uses AI to transcribe, summarize, rank candidates against employer-defined "Blueprint" criteria, and flag scripted or AI-generated answers.
§ The record
SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Willo under Video interview AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only Willo is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting | Willo |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Low |
| Headquarters | DE | GB |
| Founded | 1972 | 2018 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 54% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 70 · Willo 38
6.4 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
18% weight · 69% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 40 · Willo 30
1.8 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
15% weight · 82% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 35 · Willo 25
1.5 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
15% weight · 91% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 60 · Willo 53
1.1 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
8% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 62 · Willo 54
0.6 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 40 · Willo 36
0.5 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +11.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 11.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +12 beside that +11.9.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting minus Willo.
| Category | Weight | SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting | Willo | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 70 | 38 | +32 | +6.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 40 | 30 | +10 | +1.8 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 25 | +10 | +1.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 60 | 53 | +7 | +1.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 62 | 62 | - | - |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 40 | 36 | +4 | +0.5 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 62 | 54 | +8 | +0.6 |
| Total | 100% | 53 (F) | 41 (F) | +12 | +11.9 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting | Willo | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 17 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 9 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting has 22 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 17 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Willo has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 36 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 22 for SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, across 3 distinct source domains, and 14 for Willo, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Willo last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.