§ The result
SEEK leads TestDome on all 7 criteria.
SEEK finishes 17 points clear of TestDome under rubric v1.0 — 54 against 37 — across the Screening and Assessment cohorts. SEEK leads every one of the 7 criteria and 3 of them by 20 raw points or more, Article 11 Technical Documentation among them; TestDome leads none. Article 11 Technical Documentation is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (SEEK 70, TestDome 40, 20% weight), but it accounts for only 36% of the weighted advantage SEEK holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
SEEK
SEEK runs employment marketplaces in Australia, New Zealand and Southeast Asia (SEEK, Jobstreet and Jobsdb), and its seekAi employer tools label and rank applicants as 'high-fit' using a model trained on millions of past hirer shortlisting decisions, target job ads at predicted high-fit candidates, and run AI voice or text pre-screens, recommended shortlists and reference checks through a feature called Assist.
Vendor profile
TestDome
TestDome sells pay-per-candidate online skills tests for coding, Excel and more than 100 other skills. The tests are scored automatically, and open-ended answers can be scored by AI. AI analysis of webcam and screen proctoring recordings flags possible cheating, and a live code-interview tool is included.
§ The record
SEEK is filed under Screening AI, TestDome under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only TestDome is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | SEEK | TestDome |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Low |
| Headquarters | AU | HR |
| Founded | 1997 | 2013 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 36% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
SEEK 70 · TestDome 40
6.0 weighted points to SEEK
18% weight · 64% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
SEEK 40 · TestDome 15
4.5 weighted points to SEEK
12% weight · 78% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
SEEK 50 · TestDome 30
2.4 weighted points to SEEK
15% weight · 87% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
SEEK 60 · TestDome 50
1.5 weighted points to SEEK
12% weight · 94% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
SEEK 62 · TestDome 52
1.2 weighted points to SEEK
15% weight · 98% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
SEEK 32 · TestDome 28
0.6 weighted points to SEEK
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
SEEK 64 · TestDome 60
0.3 weighted points to SEEK
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +16.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 16.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +17 beside that +16.5.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is SEEK minus TestDome.
| Category | Weight | SEEK | TestDome | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 70 | 40 | +30 | +6.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 40 | 15 | +25 | +4.5 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 32 | 28 | +4 | +0.6 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 60 | 50 | +10 | +1.5 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 62 | 52 | +10 | +1.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 50 | 30 | +20 | +2.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 64 | 60 | +4 | +0.3 |
| Total | 100% | 54 (F) | 37 (F) | +17 | +16.5 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | SEEK | TestDome | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 23 | 7 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 27 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
SEEK has 30 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 23 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; TestDome has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 27 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for SEEK sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 61 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 30 for SEEK, across 3 distinct source domains, and 31 for TestDome, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- SEEK last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- TestDome last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next