§ The result
Teamtailor leads SeekOut by 13 points.
Teamtailor sits 13 points above SeekOut under rubric v1.0 — 47 against 34 — with Teamtailor filed under ATS-integrated and SeekOut under Sourcing. Teamtailor leads 6 of the 7 criteria, including Data Governance Disclosure, while SeekOut leads 1, including Bias Audit Transparency. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: Customer Documentation (SeekOut 35, Teamtailor 62) and Data Governance Disclosure at 15% (SeekOut 35, Teamtailor 58), the second being 24% of the weighted advantage Teamtailor holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
SeekOut
Sourcing platform aggregating public profile data into a searchable talent index, with AI-assisted candidate matching and outreach.
Vendor profile
Teamtailor
Teamtailor is a Stockholm-based applicant tracking and employer-branding platform whose OpenAI-powered "Co-pilot" assists recruiters with candidate screening, resume and interview summaries, talent-pool matching, interview-question generation, and AI-assisted job-ad and content writing.
§ The record
SeekOut is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Teamtailor under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and NYC LL 144. Only Teamtailor is in scope of Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | SeekOut | Teamtailor |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | SE |
| Founded | 2017 | 2013 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
15% weight · 21% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
SeekOut 35 · Teamtailor 58
3.4 weighted points to Teamtailor
20% weight · 40% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
SeekOut 35 · Teamtailor 50
3.0 weighted points to Teamtailor
15% weight · 56% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
SeekOut 25 · Teamtailor 42
2.5 weighted points to Teamtailor
8% weight · 69% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
SeekOut 35 · Teamtailor 62
2.2 weighted points to Teamtailor
12% weight · 82% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
SeekOut 25 · Teamtailor 42
2.0 weighted points to Teamtailor
18% weight · 93% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
SeekOut 40 · Teamtailor 30
1.8 weighted points to SeekOut
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
SeekOut 45 · Teamtailor 54
1.1 weighted points to Teamtailor
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -12.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 16.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -13 beside that -12.5.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is SeekOut minus Teamtailor.
| Category | Weight | SeekOut | Teamtailor | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 35 | 50 | -15 | -3.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 40 | 30 | +10 | +1.8 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 42 | -17 | -2.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 35 | 58 | -23 | -3.4 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 45 | 54 | -9 | -1.1 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 25 | 42 | -17 | -2.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 35 | 62 | -27 | -2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 34 (F) | 47 (F) | -13 | -12.5 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | SeekOut | Teamtailor | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 0 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 5 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 14 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
SeekOut has 9 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 5 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Teamtailor has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 14 with a source URL, 6 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 29 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 9 for SeekOut, across 1 distinct source domain, and 20 for Teamtailor, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- SeekOut last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Teamtailor last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next